We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Plan-of-the-Convention Doctrine and Its Legal Significance
Definition & Meaning
The plan-of-the-convention doctrine is a legal principle in the United States stating that when a state ratifies the U.S. Constitution, it agrees to the possibility of being sued by other states. This means that states do not have immunity from such lawsuits under the Eleventh Amendment. The doctrine suggests that by ratifying the Constitution, states have surrendered certain rights they previously held, including the right to claim sovereign immunity in specific contexts.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This doctrine is primarily relevant in civil law contexts, particularly in cases involving disputes between states. It can come into play during interstate litigation, where one state may sue another over issues such as resource allocation, environmental regulations, or contractual disputes. Users can manage certain legal processes related to this doctrine by utilizing legal templates available through US Legal Forms, which are drafted by experienced attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: State A sues State B over water rights, claiming that State B's actions are harming the shared water supply. Under the plan-of-the-convention doctrine, State B cannot claim immunity from this lawsuit.
Example 2: State C files a lawsuit against State D for failing to comply with an interstate agreement on transportation regulations. State D must respond to the lawsuit due to the doctrine's implications. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Key Difference
California
May have specific statutes governing interstate disputes.
Texas
Has unique provisions related to state liability in lawsuits.
New York
May interpret the Eleventh Amendment differently in certain contexts.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Sovereign immunity
The legal doctrine that prevents states from being sued without their consent.
The plan-of-the-convention doctrine allows for some lawsuits between states.
Eleventh Amendment
A constitutional provision that limits the ability to sue states in federal court.
The plan-of-the-convention doctrine operates within the framework set by the Eleventh Amendment.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation where the plan-of-the-convention doctrine may apply, consider the following steps:
Consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and obligations.
Explore legal templates available through US Legal Forms to assist with the necessary documentation.
Prepare to engage in the legal process if a lawsuit is initiated.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Does not provide complete immunity under the Eleventh Amendment.
Key takeaways
Frequently asked questions
Yes, under the plan-of-the-convention doctrine, states can sue each other.
Sovereign immunity is a legal doctrine that protects states from being sued without their consent.
The Eleventh Amendment limits the ability of individuals to sue states in federal court, but the plan-of-the-convention doctrine provides exceptions for interstate disputes.