The intended-use doctrine is a principle in product liability law that holds manufacturers accountable for ensuring their products are safe for the uses they are designed for and for foreseeable users. This means that when a company creates a product, it must consider how the product will be used and who will use it, taking steps to minimize risks associated with its intended use.
This doctrine is primarily used in civil law, particularly in cases involving product liability. It applies when a user is injured or suffers damages due to a product that was not safe for its intended use. In such cases, users may seek compensation from manufacturers or sellers. Legal forms related to product liability claims can often be found on platforms like US Legal Forms, which provide templates that help users navigate these legal processes.
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A manufacturer of a kitchen appliance must ensure that the appliance is safe for cooking as intended. If a user gets injured due to a design flaw while using the appliance as directed, the manufacturer may be held liable.
Example 2: A toy company produces a toy that is marketed for children aged three and up. If a child is injured while using the toy in a manner that is reasonably foreseeable, the company may be liable under the intended-use doctrine. (hypothetical example)
| State | Key Differences |
|---|---|
| California | Strict liability applies, emphasizing the manufacturer's responsibility. |
| Texas | Focuses more on the user's actions and whether they misused the product. |
| New York | Requires proof that the product was defective and not safe for its intended use. |
This is not a complete list. State laws vary and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
| Term | Definition | Key Differences |
|---|---|---|
| Product Liability | Legal responsibility of manufacturers and sellers for harm caused by defective products. | Intended-use doctrine is a specific aspect of product liability focusing on safety for intended uses. |
| Negligence | Failure to take proper care in doing something, leading to damage or injury. | Negligence requires proof of carelessness, while the intended-use doctrine focuses on product safety. |
If you believe you have been harmed by a product due to the intended-use doctrine, consider the following steps:
For complex cases, seeking professional legal help is advisable.
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
It is a principle in product liability law that holds manufacturers responsible for ensuring their products are safe for their intended uses.