We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding Objection to Consideration of a Question in Parliamentary Law
Definition & Meaning
An objection to the consideration of a question is a procedural motion in parliamentary law. This motion is used to prevent a main motion from being discussed or voted on, particularly if the motion may provoke controversy or is deemed inappropriate. Such objections are typically raised when the main motion involves sensitive topics or is considered irrelevant, unproductive, or discriminatory. By making this objection, members can avoid debating the original motion altogether.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This term is primarily used in the context of parliamentary procedure, which governs meetings and decision-making processes in various organizations, including legislative bodies, boards, and committees. Understanding how to effectively use this objection can help individuals manage discussions and maintain order during meetings. Users can benefit from templates and resources provided by US Legal Forms to navigate these procedures effectively.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A member of a community board proposes a motion to discuss a controversial issue regarding local zoning laws. Another member raises an objection to the consideration of this question, arguing that it could lead to heated arguments and is not relevant to the meeting's agenda.
Example 2: In a student council meeting, a proposal is made to discuss a personal matter involving a fellow student. A council member objects to the consideration of this question, stating that it is inappropriate and could be harmful to the individual involved. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Consideration of Objections
California
Allows objections to be raised without debate in formal meetings.
New York
Similar procedures, but may have specific rules for public bodies.
Texas
Follows Robert's Rules of Order, allowing for immediate objections.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Differences
Point of Order
A motion to call attention to a breach of rules.
Focuses on procedural issues rather than the content of the motion.
Motion to Table
A motion to postpone consideration of a motion.
Allows for future discussion, while an objection suppresses it altogether.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation where you need to raise an objection to the consideration of a question, ensure you do so promptly after the main motion is presented. Familiarize yourself with the rules of order governing your meeting. If you're unsure how to proceed, consider using resources from US Legal Forms, which offer templates and guidance for handling parliamentary procedures effectively. For complex situations, seeking advice from a legal professional may be beneficial.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.