Obiter Dictum: Insights into Judicial Remarks and Their Impact

Definition & meaning

Obiter dictum, often referred to as obiter dicta when plural, is a term used in legal contexts to describe remarks or opinions made by a judge that are not essential to the decision in a case. These comments are typically made "by the way" and do not carry legal weight, meaning they are not binding on future cases. For example, if a judge dismisses a case for lack of jurisdiction but shares thoughts on the merits of the case, those thoughts would be considered obiter dicta.

Table of content

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

Example 1: In a case where a court determines it lacks jurisdiction, the judge might comment on the merits of the case, stating, "If we had jurisdiction, I believe the plaintiff would likely prevail." This statement is obiter dictum.

Example 2: A judge discussing potential reforms to a law while ruling on a related case may provide valuable insights, but those comments remain non-binding (hypothetical example).

Comparison with related terms

Term Definition Binding Nature
Obiter Dictum Comments made by a judge that are not essential to the case decision. Non-binding
Ratio Decidendi The legal principle or reason for the decision in a case. Binding
Dicta General statements made by a judge that are not part of the legal reasoning. Non-binding

What to do if this term applies to you

If you encounter obiter dicta in a legal case, consider how these comments may impact your understanding of the law. While they are not binding, they can provide valuable context. If you are preparing legal documents or navigating a case, explore US Legal Forms for templates that can assist you. For complex legal matters, consulting a legal professional is advisable.

Quick facts

  • Obiter dicta are non-binding judicial comments.
  • They can provide insight into a judge's thinking.
  • Relevant in various areas of law, including civil and criminal cases.

Key takeaways

FAQs

Obiter dictum refers to comments made by a judge that are not essential to the case's decision.