Understanding Nil Agit Exemplum, Litem Quod Lite Resolvit in Law

Definition & Meaning

The phrase "nil agit exemplum, litem quod lite resolvit" translates to "a precedent does nothing if it resolves one dispute by creating another." This legal maxim highlights the ineffectiveness of a legal precedent that merely shifts the focus of a controversy rather than providing a clear resolution. In essence, it underscores the importance of achieving genuine resolution in legal matters, rather than complicating issues further.

Table of content

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

In a hypothetical case, a court ruling that resolves a contract dispute between two parties but inadvertently creates a new dispute regarding the interpretation of the ruling itself illustrates this maxim. If the initial resolution leads to further litigation, it exemplifies the principle of nil agit exemplum, litem quod lite resolvit.

Comparison with related terms

Term Definition Difference
Precedent A prior case that serves as an example for future cases. Nil agit exemplum emphasizes the need for effective resolution, while precedent is a broader term.
Res Judicata A doctrine that prevents re-litigation of the same issue. Res judicata focuses on finality, whereas nil agit exemplum addresses the quality of resolution.

What to do if this term applies to you

If you find yourself in a legal dispute that may involve this principle, consider documenting all aspects of the controversy thoroughly. Utilizing legal forms from US Legal Forms can help you manage the situation effectively. If the matter becomes complex, seeking professional legal assistance is advisable to ensure a proper resolution.

Quick facts

  • Legal Area: Civil law
  • Key Principle: Effective resolution of disputes
  • Common Application: Contract and tort cases

Key takeaways

Frequently asked questions

It means a precedent does nothing if it resolves one dispute by creating another.