We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Locality-Plus Test in Maritime Law
Definition & Meaning
The locality-plus test is a legal standard used in maritime law to determine if a tort, or wrongful act, falls under the jurisdiction of federal admiralty courts. Traditionally, this test focused on the location of the incident. If the wrongful act occurred on navigable waters, it was typically considered within admiralty jurisdiction. However, a landmark ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in Exec. Jet Aviation v. City of Cleveland established that the tort must not only occur on navigable waters but also relate to a traditional maritime activity. This approach emphasizes the connection between the wrongful act and maritime practices, rather than relying solely on the location of the incident.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The locality-plus test is primarily utilized in maritime law, which governs activities on navigable waters. This term is relevant in cases involving personal injury, property damage, or other torts that occur in maritime settings. Legal professionals may apply this test to determine whether a case can be heard in federal court under admiralty jurisdiction.
Individuals or entities involved in maritime activities, such as shipping companies or recreational boaters, may find themselves needing to understand this test. Users can manage related legal matters through US Legal Forms, which offers templates for various legal documents pertinent to maritime law.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
For instance, if a person is injured while working on a cargo ship in the ocean, the locality-plus test would likely apply, as the incident occurred on navigable waters and relates to maritime work. Conversely, if an accident occurs on a dock but does not involve maritime activity, it may not fall under admiralty jurisdiction. (hypothetical example)
Relevant laws & statutes
Key legal references include:
Exec. Jet Aviation v. City of Cleveland, 409 U.S. 249 (1972) - This case established the locality-plus test for admiralty jurisdiction.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Difference
Admiralty Jurisdiction
The authority of federal courts to hear cases related to maritime law.
Admiralty jurisdiction encompasses a broader range of maritime issues, while the locality-plus test specifically addresses the connection of a tort to maritime activity.
Maritime Law
The body of law governing maritime activities and navigation.
Maritime law is the overall legal framework, while the locality-plus test is a specific criterion within that framework.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe your situation involves the locality-plus test, consider the following steps:
Document the details of the incident, including location and nature of the activity.
Consult a legal professional who specializes in maritime law to assess your case.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that may help you manage related legal documents.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
The locality-plus test is a legal standard used to determine if a tort falls under federal admiralty jurisdiction based on its location and relation to maritime activities.
Unlike traditional admiralty jurisdiction, which focuses solely on the location of the incident, the locality-plus test also requires a connection to maritime activities.
While some aspects can be managed independently, consulting a legal professional is advisable for complex matters.