We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Latent Ambiguity: A Deep Dive into Its Legal Significance
Definition & Meaning
Latent ambiguity refers to a type of uncertainty in a document that is not immediately obvious upon reading it. This ambiguity only becomes clear when considering additional information or circumstances outside the document itself. In legal contexts, particularly with wills or contracts, latent ambiguity arises when the language used is unclear or can be interpreted in multiple ways based on the surrounding facts. Unlike patent ambiguities, which are evident from the document alone, latent ambiguities require external evidence to clarify their meaning.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Latent ambiguity is commonly encountered in various legal fields, including:
Contract Law: It is used to interpret agreements where the terms may be unclear when applied to specific situations.
Probate Law: In the context of wills, latent ambiguity can affect how a will is executed, particularly when the intent of the testator is questioned.
Legal practitioners often rely on extrinsic evidence to resolve these ambiguities, which may involve examining surrounding circumstances or additional documentation. Users can manage some aspects of these issues through legal templates available from US Legal Forms.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A will states that the testator wishes to leave their estate to "my children." If the testator had children from a previous marriage and the current spouse is also considered a child under state law, the intent may not be clear without additional context (hypothetical example).
Example 2: A contract for the sale of "all vehicles" may lead to a latent ambiguity if the parties have different understandings of what constitutes a vehicle, requiring examination of the circumstances surrounding the agreement (hypothetical example).
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Latent Ambiguity Treatment
California
Allows extrinsic evidence to clarify latent ambiguities in contracts.
New York
Similar approach; courts often consider surrounding circumstances.
Texas
Extrinsic evidence is permitted, but only under specific conditions.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Patent Ambiguity
Ambiguity that is obvious from the document itself.
Patent ambiguities do not require external evidence to identify.
Extrinsic Evidence
Evidence from outside the document used to clarify ambiguities.
Extrinsic evidence is used to resolve latent ambiguities but not patent ones.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe a latent ambiguity affects your legal document, consider the following steps:
Gather all relevant documents and evidence that provide context.
Consult with a legal professional to understand how to address the ambiguity.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that may help clarify your situation.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.