We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding Jus Quaesitum Tertio: Rights of Third Parties in Contracts
Definition & meaning
The term jus quaesitum tertio refers to the rights that can be granted to a third party through a contract. Generally, contracts do not automatically give rights to individuals who are not parties to the agreement. However, under certain conditions, a contract can explicitly confer benefits to a third party if it is clear that the original parties intended to do so. This means that the contract must state the intention to benefit the third party, and the third party must be made aware of this benefit. If these conditions are met, the third party has the right to enforce the contract and seek damages for any non-performance.
Table of content
Legal use & context
Jus quaesitum tertio is primarily used in contract law. It plays a significant role in situations where contracts are created for the benefit of someone who is not directly involved in the agreement. This concept is relevant in various legal areas, including:
Contract law
Trust law
Family law (e.g., in cases involving beneficiaries)
Users can manage related legal documents through tools like US Legal Forms, which provide templates drafted by attorneys for creating contracts that confer benefits to third parties.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Here are a couple of examples illustrating jus quaesitum tertio:
Example 1: A homeowner hires a contractor to build a fence and specifies in the contract that the neighbor will benefit from the fence for privacy. The neighbor can enforce this contract if the contractor fails to complete the work.
Example 2: A life insurance policyholder names their child as a beneficiary. The child has the right to claim the benefits from the policy, even though they are not a party to the insurance contract. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Key Differences
California
Allows third-party beneficiaries to sue for breach of contract if the intent is clear.
New York
Requires explicit language in the contract to confer rights to third parties.
Texas
Recognizes both intended and incidental beneficiaries, but enforcement rights may vary.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Description
Difference
Intended Beneficiary
A third party specifically named in a contract to receive benefits.
Jus quaesitum tertio applies to both intended and incidental beneficiaries.
Incidental Beneficiary
A third party who may benefit from a contract but is not specifically intended to.
Only intended beneficiaries have enforceable rights under jus quaesitum tertio.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe you are a third party entitled to benefits from a contract, consider the following steps:
Review the contract to ensure it clearly states your rights.
Confirm that you have been notified of the benefits conferred.
If necessary, consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and options.
You can also explore US Legal Forms for templates that help create contracts with clear third-party benefits.
Find a legal form that suits your needs
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.