We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Judicis Officium Est Ut Res Ita Tempora Rerum Quarere; Quaesito Tempore Tutus Eris
Understanding Judicis Officium Est Ut Res Ita Tempora Rerum Quarere; Quaesito Tempore Tutus Eris in Legal Context
Definition & Meaning
The phrase "Judicis officium est ut res ita tempora rerum quarere; quaesito tempore tutus eris" translates to "It is the duty of the judge to inquire into the timings of events as well as the events themselves; by inquiring into the time, you will be safe." This legal maxim emphasizes the importance of understanding both the facts of a case and the timing of those facts. In legal contexts, timing can significantly affect the outcome of cases, making it essential for judges to consider when events occurred in relation to the law.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This maxim is utilized primarily in judicial settings, particularly in civil and criminal law. It underscores the responsibility of judges to investigate not only the facts of a case but also the chronological aspects that may influence legal interpretations and decisions. This principle may apply in various legal scenarios, including:
Determining the statute of limitations in civil cases.
Assessing the timeline of events in criminal proceedings.
Users can manage related legal processes by utilizing legal templates available through US Legal Forms, which are drafted by qualified attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: In a personal injury case, if an injury occurred after the statute of limitations has expired, the judge must consider the timing of the injury to determine if the case can proceed.
Example 2: In a criminal trial, if evidence is presented that relates to an event that occurred outside the relevant time frame, the judge must evaluate whether that evidence is admissible based on its timing. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Key Differences
California
Statute of limitations for personal injury is two years.
New York
Statute of limitations for personal injury is three years.
Texas
Statute of limitations for personal injury is two years.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Statute of Limitations
The time limit for bringing a legal action.
Focuses solely on time limits, not the inquiry into events.
Burden of Proof
The obligation to prove one's assertion in a legal case.
Relates to the evidence required rather than the timing of events.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find that timing is a critical aspect of your legal situation, consider the following steps:
Gather all relevant documents that indicate the timing of events.
Consult with a legal professional to understand how timing may affect your case.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can assist you in managing your legal documents.
For complex matters, seeking professional legal help is advisable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.