We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Interpretatio Chartarum Benigne Facienda Est, Ut Res Magis Valeat Quam Pereat
Understanding Interpretatio Chartarum Benigne Facienda Est, Ut Res Magis Valeat Quam Pereat in Legal Context
Definition & Meaning
The phrase interpretatio chartarum benigne facienda est, ut res magis valeat quam pereat translates to "the interpretation of documents should be done generously, so that the matter may have value rather than perish." This legal principle emphasizes that when interpreting legal documents, such as contracts or deeds, the intention of the parties involved should be prioritized. The goal is to ensure that the agreement has as much legal effect as possible, even if it is not perfectly valid in every aspect.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This principle is often applied in various legal contexts, particularly in contract law and property law. It serves as a guiding rule for judges and attorneys when interpreting documents to uphold the intentions of the parties involved. Users may encounter this principle when dealing with legal forms, contracts, or property deeds, and they can utilize resources like US Legal Forms to access templates that incorporate this principle, ensuring their documents are interpreted favorably.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A homeowner sells their property but mistakenly leaves out a clause regarding the inclusion of appliances in the sale contract. If a dispute arises, the court may interpret the contract in a way that honors the homeowner's original intent to include the appliances.
Example 2: A business partnership agreement contains ambiguous language about profit sharing. If one partner claims a different interpretation, a court may apply this principle to ensure the agreement is honored as closely as possible to the parties' original intentions. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Interpretation Approach
California
Emphasizes the intent of the parties and allows for generous interpretation.
New York
Focuses on the plain meaning of the text but considers intent in ambiguous situations.
Texas
Generally adheres to a strict interpretation but allows for flexibility in certain contexts.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Strict Construction
Interpreting legal documents based on the exact wording.
Focuses on the literal meaning, unlike the generous approach of interpretatio chartarum.
Contractual Intent
The intention behind the terms of a contract.
While similar, contractual intent is more about understanding the parties' goals rather than the interpretation of the document itself.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation where this principle may apply, consider the following steps:
Review the document carefully to understand the intentions of all parties involved.
Consult with a legal professional if you need clarification on how this principle may affect your situation.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you draft documents that align with this principle.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.