We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Holding of Discrimination: Legal Insights and Implications
Definition & Meaning
The term "holding of discrimination" refers to a legal determination made by a court or an administrative law judge in the United States. This determination indicates that a local government unit, which has received federal funds, has engaged in discriminatory practices. Specifically, it involves situations where individuals are excluded from participation in programs or activities, denied benefits, or subjected to discrimination based on race, color, national origin, or sex. Such findings are critical in ensuring compliance with federal anti-discrimination laws.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A local school district receives federal funding but implements a policy that disproportionately affects students of a certain race, preventing them from accessing advanced placement courses. This could lead to a holding of discrimination.
Example 2: A city government denies a grant application from a community organization because the organization serves predominantly individuals from a specific national origin, which could also result in a finding of discrimination.
Relevant laws & statutes
Key statutes related to the holding of discrimination include:
31 USCS § 6720 - Defines the term and outlines the conditions under which discrimination is assessed.
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin in programs receiving federal assistance.
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 - Addresses discrimination based on sex in educational programs and activities receiving federal funds.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Key Differences
California
Additional protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Texas
Limited state-level protections compared to federal laws; local ordinances may vary.
New York
Stronger enforcement mechanisms for discrimination claims in housing and employment.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Discrimination
Unfair treatment of individuals based on certain characteristics.
A holding of discrimination is a legal finding, while discrimination itself is the act.
Disparate Impact
A legal theory that addresses policies that affect one group more than others.
A holding of discrimination may result from a finding of disparate impact.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe you have been subjected to discrimination as defined by a holding, consider the following steps:
Document all incidents of discrimination, including dates, times, and witnesses.
Review relevant local, state, and federal laws to understand your rights.
Consult legal professionals or organizations specializing in civil rights for guidance.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you file complaints or claims.
In complex situations, seeking professional legal assistance is advisable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Typical legal fees: Varies by attorney; some may offer free consultations.
Jurisdiction: Federal and state courts.
Possible penalties: Remedies may include reinstatement, back pay, or changes in policy.
Key takeaways
Frequently asked questions
A holding of discrimination occurs when a court finds that a local government has engaged in discriminatory practices against individuals based on race, color, national origin, or sex.
Proving discrimination typically involves gathering evidence, such as documentation of incidents, witness statements, and any relevant communications.
Yes, you can file a complaint with the relevant federal or state agencies, and you may also seek legal counsel to assist you in the process.