We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Fauntleroy Doctrine and Its Legal Implications
Definition & Meaning
The Fauntleroy Doctrine is a legal principle that requires states to honor and enforce the judgments made by courts in other states, provided that those courts had proper jurisdiction. This doctrine applies even if the judgment involves a claim that is considered illegal in the state where enforcement is sought. The principle was established in the landmark case Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U.S. 230 (1908).
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The Fauntleroy Doctrine is primarily used in civil law contexts, particularly in cases involving contracts, family law, and torts. It ensures that legal decisions made in one state are respected and enforced in another, which is crucial for maintaining legal consistency across state lines. Users may find it helpful to utilize legal forms and templates from US Legal Forms to manage situations where this doctrine applies.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A court in State A issues a judgment for a breach of contract. If the defendant moves to State B, the plaintiff can seek to enforce that judgment in State B, assuming State A had proper jurisdiction.
Example 2: A custody ruling made in State C is enforced in State D, even if certain aspects of the ruling may not align with State D's laws (hypothetical example).
State-by-state differences
State
Notes
California
Generally enforces judgments but may have specific public policy exceptions.
New York
Enforces judgments from other states unless they violate New York public policy.
Texas
Requires that the foreign judgment meets certain criteria for enforcement.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Full Faith and Credit Clause
A constitutional requirement for states to recognize each other's laws and judicial decisions.
The Fauntleroy Doctrine is a specific application of this clause concerning judgments.
Res Judicata
A legal doctrine preventing the same case from being tried again.
Res judicata applies to the same parties and issues, while the Fauntleroy Doctrine concerns enforcement across states.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you need to enforce a judgment from another state, start by confirming that the original court had proper jurisdiction. You may want to consult with a legal professional to understand the specific requirements in your state. Additionally, consider using US Legal Forms to find templates and forms that can help you navigate the enforcement process.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.