Accardi Doctrine: The Importance of Agency Adherence to Regulations

Definition & Meaning

The Accardi doctrine refers to a legal principle that mandates government agencies to adhere to their own established rules and procedures. Originating from the Supreme Court case US ex rel. Accardi, this doctrine asserts that if an agency does not follow its own regulations, its actions may be deemed invalid. Consequently, failing to provide necessary procedural safeguards can lead to the invalidation of the agency's final decisions.

Table of content

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

Example 1: A federal agency issues a fine to a business without conducting a required hearing as outlined in its own regulations. The business can challenge the fine based on the Accardi doctrine, arguing that the agency did not follow its own procedures.

Example 2: A state regulatory body denies a permit application without providing the applicant the chance to present their case, violating the procedural safeguards. The applicant may seek to overturn the decision under the Accardi doctrine. (hypothetical example)

State-by-state differences

Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):

State Key Differences
California Agencies must provide detailed reasoning for decisions, enhancing procedural safeguards.
Texas Procedural requirements may vary significantly between state agencies.

This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.

Comparison with related terms

Term Definition Difference
Due Process The legal requirement that the state must respect all legal rights owed to a person. Accardi focuses specifically on agency adherence to its own rules, while due process is broader.
Administrative Procedure Act A federal statute that governs the way administrative agencies may propose and establish regulations. The Accardi doctrine is a principle derived from case law, while the Administrative Procedure Act is a formal statute.

What to do if this term applies to you

If you believe an agency has violated its own regulations in your case, consider the following steps:

  • Review the agency's regulations to identify the specific procedural safeguards that were not followed.
  • Gather evidence to support your claim that the agency's actions were invalid.
  • Consult with a legal professional for advice tailored to your situation.
  • Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you draft necessary documents or appeals.

Quick facts

  • Applies to: Administrative agencies
  • Key Principle: Agencies must follow their own rules
  • Potential Outcomes: Invalidated agency actions

Key takeaways

Frequently asked questions

It is a legal principle requiring agencies to adhere to their own regulations, with failure leading to potential invalidation of decisions.