We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Express Negligence Doctrine: A Comprehensive Guide
Definition & Meaning
The express negligence doctrine is a legal principle that requires parties to clearly state their intention to indemnify another party for their own negligence within a contract. This means that if one party wants to protect another from the consequences of their negligence, this intent must be explicitly outlined in the contract's language. The doctrine emphasizes that such intent must be evident within the contract itself, ensuring that all parties understand their responsibilities and liabilities.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This doctrine is primarily used in contract law, particularly in agreements involving indemnity clauses. It is commonly found in various legal contexts, including:
Construction contracts
Commercial leases
Service agreements
Users can manage these agreements using legal templates available through US Legal Forms, which are drafted by qualified attorneys to ensure compliance with applicable laws.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A construction company enters into a contract with a property owner. The contract includes a clause stating that the property owner will indemnify the construction company for any damages resulting from the construction work. This clause must clearly outline the extent of the indemnification to be enforceable.
Example 2: A service provider agrees to maintain equipment for a business. The contract specifies that the business will not hold the service provider liable for any accidents caused by improper use of the equipment. This clause must be explicitly stated to protect the service provider from negligence claims. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Key Differences
California
Requires clear language to indemnify against one's own negligence.
Texas
Limits indemnity for negligence to specific circumstances outlined in the contract.
New York
Enforces strict adherence to the express negligence doctrine in construction contracts.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Implied indemnity
Indemnity that is not explicitly stated but inferred from the contract's terms.
Does not require explicit language; relies on interpretation.
Negligence
Failure to take reasonable care that results in damage or injury.
Negligence refers to the act itself, while express negligence doctrine pertains to contractual indemnification.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are entering into a contract that includes indemnity clauses, ensure that the language is clear and explicitly states the intention to indemnify for negligence. Consider using US Legal Forms to access templates that can help you draft these agreements correctly. If you find the terms complex or unclear, consulting a legal professional is advisable to protect your interests.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.