We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding Ex Maleficio Non Oritur Contractus: A Legal Perspective
Definition & Meaning
The phrase "ex maleficio non oritur contractus" translates to "a contract cannot arise out of an act that is fundamentally wrong or illegal." This legal principle asserts that agreements based on dishonest actions or those that violate public policy are not enforceable in court. Essentially, if a contract stems from illegal conduct, it cannot be upheld by the law.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This principle is primarily used in contract law, where it serves to protect public policy by ensuring that contracts are based on lawful and ethical actions. It applies in various legal contexts, including civil law cases involving contracts and agreements. Users may encounter this principle when dealing with contracts that involve illegal activities, such as drug trafficking or fraud. Legal templates from US Legal Forms can assist users in drafting valid contracts that comply with the law.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A person enters into a contract to sell stolen property. Since the act of theft is illegal, the contract is unenforceable.
Example 2: Two parties agree to form a partnership to conduct illegal gambling. This agreement cannot be enforced due to its basis in unlawful activity. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Legal Stance on Contracts from Illegal Acts
California
Contracts arising from illegal acts are void and unenforceable.
New York
Contracts based on illegal purposes are void, but the court may enforce a contract if it can be separated from the illegal aspect.
Texas
Contracts that involve illegal acts are generally void, protecting public policy.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Void Contract
A contract that is not legally enforceable from the moment it is created.
Ex maleficio specifically addresses contracts arising from illegal acts.
Unenforceable Contract
A valid contract that cannot be enforced due to certain legal defenses.
Ex maleficio focuses on contracts that arise from wrongful acts.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself involved in a contract that may be based on illegal actions, it is crucial to seek legal advice. A legal professional can help you understand your rights and options. Additionally, you can explore US Legal Forms for templates that ensure your agreements are lawful and enforceable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.