We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
The Empty-Chair Doctrine: What It Means for Legal Proceedings
Definition & Meaning
The empty-chair doctrine is a legal principle that allows a judge to instruct a jury to assume that the absence of a witness, who could have provided testimony but was not produced, indicates that their testimony would have been unfavorable to the party responsible for their absence. This doctrine enables lawyers to highlight the lack of a witness and encourages jurors to consider this absence when evaluating the evidence presented in a case.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The empty-chair doctrine is commonly used in various legal contexts, including civil and criminal cases. It is particularly relevant in situations where a party fails to present a witness who could support their claims or defenses. Lawyers may leverage this doctrine to strengthen their arguments by drawing attention to the absence of potentially damaging testimony from the opposing side. Users can manage related legal documents and procedures using templates available on platforms like US Legal Forms.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
(hypothetical example) In a personal injury case, the plaintiff's attorney may argue that the defendant's failure to call a key eyewitness, who was present at the accident, should lead the jury to conclude that the witness would have provided testimony harmful to the defendant's case.
State-by-state differences
State
Notes
California
California recognizes the empty-chair doctrine, allowing juries to infer adverse evidence from the absence of a witness.
New York
In New York, the doctrine is also applicable, but specific procedural rules may affect its implementation.
Texas
Texas courts apply the doctrine, but the absence must be clearly linked to the party's case for it to be effective.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Adverse-inference rule
A legal principle allowing a jury to infer that a party's failure to present evidence indicates that the evidence would have been unfavorable.
Similar to the empty-chair doctrine, but can apply to any missing evidence, not just witnesses.
Burden of proof
The obligation to prove one's assertion or case in court.
The empty-chair doctrine relates to the implications of missing evidence, while burden of proof concerns who must prove what.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation where the empty-chair doctrine may apply, consider the following steps:
Consult with a legal professional to understand how this doctrine may impact your case.
Gather any evidence or documentation that supports your position regarding the absent witness.
Explore legal form templates on US Legal Forms to prepare necessary documents related to your case.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Potential outcome: Jury may infer unfavorable evidence
Key takeaways
Frequently asked questions
It is a legal principle that allows juries to infer that the absence of a witness indicates unfavorable evidence for the party responsible for their absence.
The empty-chair doctrine can be used in both civil and criminal cases where a relevant witness is not presented.
Consult a legal professional and gather supporting evidence related to the absent witness.