We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Eggshell-Skull Rule: Liability in Tort Law
Definition & meaning
The eggshell-skull rule is a legal principle in tort law stating that a defendant is responsible for the full extent of a plaintiff's injuries, even if those injuries were unexpected or more severe than what could be reasonably anticipated. This means that if a person has a pre-existing vulnerability, the defendant must "take their victim as they find them." The rule emphasizes that the defendant's liability is not diminished by the victim's unique circumstances or vulnerabilities.
Table of content
Legal use & context
This rule is primarily used in civil law, particularly in personal injury cases. It applies when a defendant's negligent or intentional act causes harm to a plaintiff who may have had a pre-existing condition that exacerbates the injury. Legal practitioners often rely on this rule to establish liability in cases involving unexpected injuries. Users can manage related legal forms and procedures through resources like US Legal Forms, which offer templates drafted by qualified attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
(Hypothetical example) If a person with a fragile bone condition is involved in a minor car accident caused by another driver's negligence, and they suffer a severe fracture that a healthy person would not have, the driver is still liable for the full extent of the injury due to the eggshell-skull rule.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Variation
California
Recognizes the eggshell-skull rule and applies it broadly in personal injury cases.
Texas
Also applies the rule but may consider the plaintiff's pre-existing conditions more closely in damage calculations.
New York
Similar application as California, with a focus on the severity of the injury rather than the plaintiff's condition.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Thin-skull rule
Similar to the eggshell-skull rule, it holds defendants liable for all injuries, regardless of the victim's pre-existing conditions.
Essentially synonymous with the eggshell-skull rule.
Comparative negligence
A legal doctrine that reduces the plaintiff's damages based on their percentage of fault in causing the injury.
Comparative negligence can reduce liability, whereas the eggshell-skull rule does not.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe you have a case involving the eggshell-skull rule, consider the following steps:
Document all injuries and medical conditions thoroughly.
Consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and options.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you manage your case efficiently.
For complex situations, seeking professional legal help is advisable.
Find a legal form that suits your needs
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Defendants are liable for all injuries, regardless of pre-existing conditions.
Commonly recognized across many states.
Key takeaways
FAQs
It is a legal principle that holds defendants liable for the full extent of a plaintiff's injuries, even if those injuries were unexpected.
In personal injury cases, if a defendant's actions cause more severe injuries due to the plaintiff's pre-existing condition, the defendant is still fully liable.
No, the eggshell-skull rule ensures that defendants cannot reduce their liability based on the plaintiff's vulnerabilities.