We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Easement by Implication: A Comprehensive Guide to Its Legal Meaning
Definition & Meaning
An easement by implication is a legal right that allows a person to use a portion of another person's property for a specific purpose, based on the circumstances surrounding the property's use. This type of easement typically arises when a property is divided into separate parcels, and one parcel benefits from the use of a part of the other parcel, even if no formal agreement exists. The use must be apparent, continuous, and necessary for the reasonable enjoyment of the dominant estate.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Easements by implication are commonly encountered in real estate law. They often arise during property transactions, such as when a landowner sells a portion of their land but retains an easement for access or utilities. This type of easement can be crucial in ensuring that the remaining property can be utilized effectively. Users can manage related legal documents, such as easement agreements, using templates available from resources like US Legal Forms.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A homeowner sells a part of their land to a neighbor but retains a strip of land that provides access to a well located on the sold parcel. The homeowner has an easement by implication to access the well.
Example 2: A property owner divides their land into two lots. The only access to the second lot is through a driveway on the first lot. The owner of the second lot may have an easement by implication for the use of the driveway. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
State
Key Differences
California
Recognizes easements by implication based on prior use and necessity.
Texas
Allows easements by implication but requires clear evidence of prior use.
New York
Emphasizes the necessity and continuity of use for easements by implication.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Easement by Prescription
An easement acquired through continuous and open use over a statutory period.
Requires a specific time period of use; does not imply necessity.
Easement by Necessity
An easement granted when a property is landlocked and requires access.
Focuses on access necessity rather than implied use.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe you have an easement by implication, consider the following steps:
Document the usage of the property and any agreements related to it.
Consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and obligations.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates related to easements and property agreements that may help clarify your situation.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Key Requirement: Necessity for enjoyment of the dominant estate
Duration: Indefinite, as long as the use continues
Key takeaways
Frequently asked questions
An easement by implication is a legal right to use a portion of another's property based on the circumstances of property use, typically arising when a property is divided.
An easement by prescription requires continuous and open use for a statutory period, while an easement by implication arises from necessity and prior use without a specified duration.
Yes, easements by implication can be challenged in court, especially if the criteria for necessity and continuity are not met.