The collateral-contract doctrine is a legal principle that allows for the introduction of evidence about a second agreement, typically an oral agreement, in disputes involving a written contract. This second agreement must be independent of the written contract and consistent with its terms. The information contained in the oral agreement is not usually expected to be included in the written contract itself.
This doctrine is primarily applied in civil law, particularly in contract disputes. It is relevant in cases where parties have made oral agreements that complement or clarify the terms of a written contract. Users may find it beneficial to utilize legal templates from US Legal Forms to draft contracts that clearly outline both written and oral agreements, ensuring all parties are aware of their obligations.
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A contractor and a homeowner have a written contract for home renovations. During discussions, they agree verbally on additional work that is not included in the written contract. If a dispute arises regarding this additional work, the homeowner can present evidence of the oral agreement under the collateral-contract doctrine.
(Hypothetical example) Example 2: A business owner signs a lease for office space. They verbally agree with the landlord on reduced rent for the first three months. If the landlord later disputes this arrangement, the business owner can use the collateral-contract doctrine to introduce evidence of the oral agreement.
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
| State | Key Differences |
|---|---|
| California | Allows for broader interpretation of oral agreements. |
| New York | Requires clear evidence of the oral agreement's terms. |
| Texas | May limit the scope of oral agreements in certain contracts. |
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
| Term | Definition | Key Differences |
|---|---|---|
| Parol Evidence Rule | A rule that excludes oral agreements that contradict a written contract. | The collateral-contract doctrine allows for oral agreements that do not contradict the written contract. |
| Implied Contract | A contract formed by the actions or conduct of the parties rather than written or spoken words. | The collateral-contract doctrine specifically addresses oral agreements that complement written contracts. |
If you find yourself in a situation involving a dispute over a written contract and an oral agreement, consider the following steps:
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Yes, oral agreements can be enforced if they meet the criteria of the collateral-contract doctrine.