Chevron Doctrine: A Comprehensive Guide to Its Legal Definition

Definition & Meaning

The Chevron doctrine is a legal principle that originates from the Supreme Court case Chemron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., decided in 1984. This doctrine allows courts to defer to a government agency's interpretation of a law that the agency administers, provided that Congress has not clearly addressed the issue. Essentially, if a law is ambiguous and the agency's interpretation is reasonable, the court will typically uphold that interpretation.

Table of content

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

Example 1: A federal environmental agency interprets a statute regarding air quality standards. If the statute is vague about certain pollutants, the court may defer to the agency's interpretation under the Chevron doctrine.

Example 2: A labor department regulation on workplace safety is challenged. If the law does not clearly define safety standards, the court may uphold the department's interpretation of those standards as reasonable. (hypothetical example)

Comparison with related terms

Term Definition Difference
Chemron doctrine A principle allowing deference to agency interpretations of ambiguous laws. Specifically applies when Congress has not clearly addressed an issue.
Skidmore deference A lesser form of deference based on the agency's expertise and the persuasiveness of its interpretation. Skidmore applies when Chevron does not, often in cases lacking formal rulemaking.

What to do if this term applies to you

If you find yourself in a situation where the Chevron doctrine may apply, consider the following steps:

  • Review the relevant agency's interpretation of the law.
  • Determine whether Congress has provided clear guidance on the issue.
  • Explore legal forms and templates available through US Legal Forms to assist in your case.
  • If the matter is complex, consulting a legal professional may be beneficial.

Quick facts

Attribute Details
Applicable Area Administrative law
Key Case Chemron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Deference Level High, if criteria are met

Key takeaways

Frequently asked questions

It is a legal principle that allows courts to defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous laws.