We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
What is Blakely Error and Why It Matters in Sentencing Law?
Definition & Meaning
The Blakely error refers to a legal principle that arises from the U.S. Supreme Court case Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004). This principle holds that a judge cannot impose a sentence that exceeds the maximum allowed based solely on facts that were not presented to a jury or admitted by the defendant. In this case, the defendant was sentenced beyond the statutory maximum because the judge found that he acted with "deliberate cruelty," a fact not determined by a jury. This ruling emphasizes the importance of jury findings in sentencing and protects defendants' rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The Blakely error is primarily relevant in criminal law, particularly in sentencing practices. It serves as a safeguard to ensure that defendants are not subjected to harsher sentences based on unproven allegations. Legal professionals must be aware of this principle when preparing for sentencing hearings, as it can affect the outcome of a case. Users may find it beneficial to utilize legal templates from US Legal Forms to navigate the complexities of sentencing and appeals related to Blakely errors.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
For instance, if a defendant is convicted of robbery and the judge decides to impose a longer sentence based on the claim that the robbery was committed with "extreme violence," this could constitute a Blakely error if that fact was not presented to a jury. (hypothetical example)
Relevant laws & statutes
The primary case governing the Blakely error is Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004). This ruling has influenced subsequent cases and legal interpretations regarding sentencing practices in the United States.
State-by-state differences
State
Application of Blakely Error
California
Strict adherence to jury findings in sentencing.
Texas
Limited application; some sentencing enhancements may be permitted.
New York
Requires jury determination for certain aggravating factors.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Apprendi Error
Refers to the requirement that any fact increasing a sentence must be submitted to a jury.
Broader than Blakely; applies to any fact, not just those related to the statutory maximum.
Sentencing Enhancement
Additional penalties based on specific circumstances of a crime.
Can be valid if proven to a jury; Blakely error occurs when enhancements are not proven.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe a Blakely error has occurred in your sentencing, consider the following steps:
Review the facts of your case and identify any unproven allegations used in sentencing.
Consult with a legal professional who can provide guidance on appealing your sentence.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that may assist in filing an appeal or other legal documents.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.