We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Unlawful Combination: Definition and Legal Implications
Definition & Meaning
An unlawful combination refers to an agreement between two or more parties that restricts trade or competition in a way that is prohibited by law. Such agreements are considered illegal under various statutes because they can harm consumers and other businesses by limiting choices and inflating prices.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This term is primarily used in antitrust law, which aims to promote fair competition and prevent monopolistic practices. Unlawful combinations can arise in various legal contexts, including civil litigation and regulatory enforcement. Users may encounter this term when dealing with business contracts, mergers, or disputes involving trade practices. Legal forms related to agreements and antitrust issues can be found through resources like US Legal Forms.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A group of competing companies agrees to set prices at a certain level, which prevents fair competition and harms consumers. This agreement would be considered an unlawful combination.
Example 2: A manufacturer and a retailer collude to limit the distribution of a product to certain areas, restricting market access for other retailers. This is also an unlawful combination.
Relevant laws & statutes
Key statutes related to unlawful combinations include:
Sherman Antitrust Act: Prohibits contracts, combinations, or conspiracies in restraint of trade.
Clayton Act: Addresses specific practices that the Sherman Act does not cover, such as price discrimination and exclusive dealing agreements.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Key Differences
California
Has stricter regulations on anti-competitive practices compared to federal standards.
New York
Enforces additional state antitrust laws that may impose heavier penalties.
Texas
Focuses on protecting consumers and small businesses from unfair trade practices.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Conspiracy in restraint of trade
A specific type of unlawful combination where parties conspire to limit competition.
Focuses on the agreement aspect rather than just the combination.
Monopoly
A market structure where a single seller dominates the market.
Monopoly refers to market control, while unlawful combination refers to the agreement to restrict trade.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you suspect that you are involved in or affected by an unlawful combination, consider the following steps:
Document any agreements or communications related to the suspected unlawful combination.
Consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and options.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you draft necessary legal documents.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.