We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Exploring the Three Wicked Sisters: Legal Implications and History
Definition & Meaning
The term "three wicked sisters" refers to three common law defenses that were historically used to deny compensation to workers injured on the job. These defenses are:
Contributory negligence
Fellow servant rule
Assumption of risk
These doctrines were termed "wicked" because they significantly limited the ability of injured workers to recover damages. The Workman's Compensation Act later abolished these common law defenses, allowing for better protection and compensation for workers injured in the course of their employment.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The term "three wicked sisters" is primarily used in the context of workers' compensation law. It is relevant in civil law cases involving workplace injuries where these defenses might have previously been invoked to deny claims. The abolition of these defenses under the Workman's Compensation Act represents a significant shift in legal practice, allowing injured workers to seek compensation without facing these barriers.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
(Hypothetical example) A factory worker is injured while operating machinery. The employer claims contributory negligence, arguing that the worker was not following safety protocols. Under the old common law, this could have resulted in the worker being denied compensation. However, under the Workman's Compensation Act, the worker can still file for benefits regardless of their actions.
Relevant laws & statutes
The Workman's Compensation Act is the primary statute that abolished the three wicked sisters. This act established a no-fault system for compensating injured workers, eliminating the need to prove negligence on the part of the employer.
State-by-state differences
State
Notes
California
Workers' compensation laws are comprehensive and provide benefits regardless of fault.
Texas
Employers can opt out of the workers' compensation system, which may affect claims.
New York
Strict liability for employers under workers' compensation laws, eliminating common law defenses.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Workers' Compensation
A system providing benefits to employees injured on the job.
Workers' compensation eliminates the need for proving negligence.
Negligence
Failure to take proper care in doing something, leading to damage or injury.
Negligence is a basis for liability, unlike the defenses of the three wicked sisters.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are injured at work and are unsure about your rights, consider the following steps:
Report your injury to your employer as soon as possible.
File a claim for workers' compensation benefits.
Consult with a legal professional if you encounter difficulties with your claim.
Explore US Legal Forms for ready-to-use legal templates that can assist you in managing your claim.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.