We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Rule in Wild's Case: A Key Legal Principle
Definition & meaning
The Rule in Wild's Case is a legal principle that determines how property is inherited when it is left to a person and their children. Specifically, if a person (referred to as "A") is given land in a will and has children at the time the will is created, both A and the children will inherit the property together upon A's death. However, if A does not have children at the time the will is made or at the time of the testator's death, A will inherit the property as an estate-tail, meaning the property can only be passed down to A's descendants. This rule has been abolished in most states, along with the concept of fee tail, making it less relevant in modern legal contexts.
Table of content
Legal use & context
The Rule in Wild's Case is primarily used in property law, particularly in the context of wills and trusts. It helps clarify how property is to be distributed among heirs. Legal practitioners may encounter this rule when advising clients on estate planning or interpreting wills. Although the rule has been largely abolished, understanding its implications can still be relevant in states where it might apply or in historical contexts. Users can manage their estate planning needs using legal templates available through US Legal Forms.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
(Hypothetical example) If a will states, "I leave my land to John and his children," and John has two children at the time of the will's creation, both John and his children will inherit the land. However, if the will states the same but John has no children at that time, John will inherit the land as an estate-tail, meaning he can pass it on only to his descendants.
State-by-state differences
State
Application of Rule
California
Fee tail abolished; modern statutes apply.
New York
Fee tail abolished; standard inheritance rules apply.
Texas
Similar rules apply; fee tail abolished.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Difference
Fee Tail
A type of estate that restricts inheritance to direct descendants.
Rule in Wild's Case specifically applies to the phrasing of a will.
Joint Tenancy
A form of ownership where two or more people hold property together.
Joint tenancy involves equal ownership, while the rule addresses inheritance rights.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are dealing with a will that may involve the Rule in Wild's Case, consider reviewing the document closely to understand inheritance rights. If you have questions or need assistance, using US Legal Forms can provide you with templates and guidance tailored to your needs. For complex situations, consulting a legal professional is advisable.
Find a legal form that suits your needs
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.