We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
The Protective Principle: Jurisdiction and Security in International Law
Definition & Meaning
The protective principle is a concept in international law that allows a sovereign state to claim jurisdiction over actions taken by individuals outside its borders if those actions pose a threat to the state's security or disrupt its governmental functions. This principle is based on the idea that a state has the right to protect itself from external threats, even if the conduct occurs beyond its territorial limits.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The protective principle is primarily used in international law and can be relevant in various legal contexts, including criminal law and national security cases. It allows countries to take legal action against individuals who engage in activities abroad that may harm the state or its interests. This principle is often invoked in cases involving terrorism, espionage, or other actions that threaten national security.
Users may find legal forms related to protective measures or actions against individuals under this principle through resources like US Legal Forms, which offers templates to assist in navigating these legal processes.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
One example of the protective principle in action is the case of United States v. Zehe, where a U.S. court asserted jurisdiction over a defendant whose actions abroad were deemed to threaten U.S. security.
(Hypothetical example): A country may prosecute an individual for planning a terrorist attack against its citizens while the individual is located in another nation.
Relevant laws & statutes
One significant case related to the protective principle is United States v. Zehe, 601 F. Supp. 196 (D. Mass. 1985), which illustrates the application of this principle in U.S. law. Other relevant statutes may include anti-terrorism laws and national security regulations, but specific statutes can vary by jurisdiction.
State-by-state differences
State
Application of Protective Principle
California
Strong emphasis on protecting state interests from external threats.
New York
Active use of protective measures in national security cases.
Texas
Similar application, focusing on state sovereignty and security.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Active personality principle
Jurisdiction based on the nationality of the perpetrator.
Protective principle focuses on the threat to the state, not the nationality of the actor.
Universal jurisdiction
Allows states to prosecute serious crimes regardless of where they occurred.
Protective principle is specific to threats against a state, while universal jurisdiction applies to certain crimes.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe that the protective principle may apply to your situation, consider the following steps:
Consult with a legal professional who specializes in international law or national security.
Explore legal templates and forms available through US Legal Forms to assist in your legal needs.
Gather any relevant documentation that supports your case or concerns.
In complex matters, seeking professional legal help is advisable to navigate the intricacies of international law.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.