We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
The Philadelphia Plan: A Legal Overview of Its Impact on Employment
Definition & Meaning
The Philadelphia Plan is an initiative aimed at combating employment discrimination within the construction industry in Philadelphia. Launched by senior city officials, this plan requires contractors who work with the federal government to set their own goals for minority employment. These goals must align with standards established by the government. The initiative emerged in response to findings from the Department of Labor, which revealed that minority representation in key construction trades was only about one percent, despite minorities making up approximately thirty percent of the local construction workforce.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The Philadelphia Plan is primarily relevant in civil rights law and employment law. It serves as a framework for ensuring equal employment opportunities in federally funded construction projects. Legal practitioners may use this plan to advocate for fair hiring practices and to challenge discriminatory practices in the construction industry. Users can manage related legal processes by utilizing templates provided by US Legal Forms, which can assist in drafting necessary documentation for compliance with the plan.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A construction company bidding on a federal project in Philadelphia sets a goal to increase minority employment from one percent to ten percent over the next year, following the guidelines of the Philadelphia Plan.
Example 2: A contractor successfully implements a training program for minority workers, resulting in a significant increase in their hiring rates for a federally funded construction project. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Key Differences
California
Similar initiatives exist, but with additional state-specific requirements for minority participation.
New York
Employs a different set of standards for minority contracting goals in public works projects.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Differences
Affirmative Action
Policies aimed at increasing opportunities for historically underrepresented groups.
Broader scope than the Philadelphia Plan, which is specific to construction contracts.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)
Legal requirement for employers to provide equal treatment in hiring and employment.
EEO is a general principle, while the Philadelphia Plan includes specific goals for minority hiring.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are a contractor working on federal projects in Philadelphia, familiarize yourself with the Philadelphia Plan's requirements. Set achievable minority hiring goals and document your progress. Consider using US Legal Forms to access templates for compliance documentation. If you face complex legal challenges, consulting with a legal professional is advisable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.