The ore tenus rule is a legal principle that presumes the findings of fact made by a trial court are correct. This presumption means that these findings should not be overturned unless there is clear evidence that they are wrong or unjust. The rule is based on the idea that trial courts, when hearing oral testimony, can assess the credibility and demeanor of witnesses, which is crucial for making informed decisions.
The ore tenus rule is primarily used in civil and family law cases. It applies when a trial court makes factual determinations based on oral testimony. This rule is important because it affects how appeals are handled; appellate courts generally defer to the trial court's findings unless there is a compelling reason to overturn them. Users may find it beneficial to utilize legal templates from US Legal Forms to help navigate cases involving the ore tenus rule effectively.
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: In a custody dispute, a trial court hears testimony from both parents. Based on their observations, the court determines which parent is more suitable for custody. If one parent appeals the decision, the appellate court will generally uphold the trial court's findings unless there is clear evidence of error.
Example 2: In a personal injury case, the trial court evaluates witness statements regarding the accident. The court's factual findings will be presumed correct on appeal unless proven otherwise. (hypothetical example)
One notable case that illustrates the ore tenus rule is Smiley v. State, 2010 Ala. LEXIS 78 (Ala. May 7, 2010), which affirms that findings based on oral testimony are given the same weight as a jury's verdict and are presumed correct on appeal.
| State | Variation |
|---|---|
| Alabama | Strong adherence to ore tenus rule in family law cases. |
| Florida | Similar application but may involve more stringent standards in certain contexts. |
| California | Less reliance on ore tenus; written findings are often favored. |
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
| Term | Definition | Key Differences |
|---|---|---|
| Findings of Fact | Determinations made by a judge or jury based on evidence. | Ore tenus specifically relates to oral testimony. |
| Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (JNOV) | A court's decision to overturn a jury's verdict. | Ore tenus presumes correctness of trial court findings. |
If you are involved in a case where the ore tenus rule may apply, consider the following steps:
If your case is complex, seeking professional legal advice is recommended.
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.