We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Nunquam Crescit Ex Post Facto Praeteriti Delicti Aestimatio
Understanding Nunquam Crescit Ex Post Facto Praeteriti Delicti Aestimatio: A Legal Insight
Definition & Meaning
The phrase "Nunquam crescit ex post facto praeteriti delicti aestimatio" translates to "the assessment of a past offense does not increase based on subsequent events." This legal maxim emphasizes that the evaluation of damages or the seriousness of a past crime remains unchanged by later developments. Essentially, it conveys that the nature of a past wrongdoing is fixed and cannot be altered by what occurs afterward.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This term is often used in legal discussions surrounding civil and criminal law. It is particularly relevant in cases involving torts, where the assessment of damages must be based solely on the circumstances at the time of the offense, without consideration of later events that may affect perception or valuation. Users can manage related legal processes themselves using templates available through US Legal Forms, which are drafted by experienced attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
For instance, if a person is found liable for damages due to a car accident, the amount they owe is based on the circumstances of the accident itself, not on any negative publicity or changes in the victim's condition that arise afterward. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Legal Context
California
Emphasizes the fixed nature of damages in tort cases.
New York
Similar principles apply, focusing on the assessment at the time of the offense.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Ex Post Facto
Laws that apply retroactively.
This maxim specifically refers to assessments of past actions, not laws.
Damages
Monetary compensation for harm or injury.
This maxim influences how damages are assessed but is not a type of damage itself.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation where this maxim is relevant, consider gathering all evidence related to the original offense. If you're dealing with a legal matter, using US Legal Forms can provide you with templates to help manage the process efficiently. For more complex issues, seeking professional legal assistance is advisable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.