Misappropriation Theory: The Legal Framework Behind Securities Fraud

Definition & Meaning

Misappropriation theory refers to the legal principle that an individual who improperly uses confidential information to trade securities is committing securities fraud. This theory is grounded in the idea that such actions violate a duty owed to the source of the information, whether that source is a person or an organization. Essentially, if someone uses insider knowledge to buy or sell stocks or other securities, they may be held liable for misappropriation.

Table of content

Legal Use & context

Misappropriation theory is primarily used in the context of securities law. It is relevant in cases of fraud and insider trading, where individuals exploit confidential information for personal gain. Legal practitioners may encounter this theory in civil litigation or regulatory enforcement actions. Users can manage related legal documents, such as disclosures or trading agreements, using templates from US Legal Forms, which are prepared by qualified attorneys.

Key legal elements

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

Example 1: A corporate executive learns about an upcoming merger that will significantly increase the value of their company's stock. If they buy shares based on this insider information before it becomes public, they may be guilty of misappropriation.

Example 2: An employee at a financial firm overhears confidential information about a client's pending acquisition. If they use this information to sell their own stock in the target company, this could also constitute misappropriation. (hypothetical example)

Relevant laws & statutes

Key legislation related to misappropriation theory includes:

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which regulates securities trading and insider trading.
Case law such as United States v. O'Hagan, which clarified the application of misappropriation theory in insider trading cases.

State-by-state differences

Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):

State	Misappropriation Application
California	Strong enforcement of insider trading laws with specific penalties.
New York	Home to many financial institutions, with rigorous scrutiny of trading practices.
Texas	Similar laws, but enforcement may vary based on local regulatory bodies.

This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.

Comparison with related terms

Term	Definition	Key Differences
Insider Trading	Buying or selling securities based on material, non-public information.	Insider trading is a broader term that includes both legal and illegal activities.
Fraud	Deliberate deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain.	Misappropriation specifically involves the misuse of confidential information.

Common misunderstandings

What to do if this term applies to you

If you suspect that you have been involved in a misappropriation case, consider the following steps:

Document all relevant communications and transactions.
Consult a legal professional to assess your situation and options.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you manage related legal documents.

Find the legal form that fits your case

Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.

This field is required

Quick facts

Typical penalties can include fines and imprisonment.
Jurisdiction typically falls under federal law, but state laws may also apply.
Confidential information can include trade secrets, financial data, and other sensitive information.