Understanding Marriage Per Verba De Futuro Subsequente Copula: A Legal Perspective

Definition & Meaning

Marriage per verba de futuro subsequente copula refers to a type of marriage that is established through a promise to marry in the future, followed by a physical act of consummation. This form of marriage was recognized in Scotland until 1940, allowing couples to create a legally binding relationship based on their intentions and actions.

Table of content

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

Example 1: A couple agrees to marry in one year and begins living together as partners. They later engage in sexual relations, which may establish their marriage under the principles of marriage per verba de futuro subsequente copula.

(Hypothetical example)

State-by-state differences

Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):

State Recognition of Similar Marital Concepts
Scotland Historically recognized until 1940.
New York Does not recognize this form of marriage.
California Does not recognize this form of marriage.

This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.

Comparison with related terms

Term Definition Key Differences
Common Law Marriage A marriage recognized based on the couple's actions and mutual agreement. Common law marriage requires cohabitation and public acknowledgment; marriage per verba de futuro does not.
Formal Marriage A marriage that is legally recognized through a ceremony and official documentation. Formal marriage requires a legal ceremony; marriage per verba de futuro does not.

What to do if this term applies to you

If you believe that this type of marriage applies to your situation, consider consulting with a legal professional to understand your rights and obligations. You can also explore US Legal Forms for templates that may assist you in documenting your intentions or agreements.

Quick facts

  • Type of marriage: Irregular, based on promise and consummation.
  • Historical recognition: Valid in Scotland until 1940.
  • Legal implications: Varies significantly by jurisdiction.

Key takeaways

Frequently asked questions

No, it is largely historical and not recognized in most jurisdictions.