We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict: A Comprehensive Guide
Definition & Meaning
Judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) is a legal procedure in civil jury trials where a judge can overturn or modify a jury's decision. This action is taken when the judge believes that the jury's verdict is unreasonable or not supported by sufficient evidence. A JNOV is only appropriate if no reasonable jury could have arrived at the same conclusion. It is important to note that a judge cannot use JNOV to declare a defendant guilty after a jury has acquitted them, as this would violate the principle of double jeopardy.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
JNOV is primarily used in civil cases, but it is also relevant in certain criminal contexts. This legal mechanism allows judges to ensure that jury decisions align with the evidence presented during the trial. JNOV can be a critical tool for both plaintiffs and defendants, providing a way to challenge jury verdicts that seem unjust. Users can manage related legal documents and forms through platforms like US Legal Forms, which offer templates drafted by experienced attorneys.
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: In a civil negligence case, a jury awards the plaintiff a large sum in damages. The defendant believes the evidence presented does not support such a verdict. They may file for a JNOV, arguing that no reasonable jury could have reached that decision based on the facts.
Example 2: (hypothetical example) A jury finds a business liable for breach of contract. The judge reviews the evidence and concludes that the contract terms were not adequately proven. The judge may then grant a JNOV to overturn the jury's decision.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
JNOV Standards
California
Allows JNOV in civil cases if the verdict is not supported by substantial evidence.
New York
Permits JNOV when the jury's verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence.
Texas
Requires a clear showing that the jury's decision was unreasonable based on the evidence.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Differences
Motion for a new trial
A request to re-examine the case due to errors or issues during the trial.
JNOV overturns the jury's verdict, while a new trial allows for a complete re-evaluation of the case.
Appeal
A request to a higher court to review the decision of a lower court.
JNOV is decided by the trial judge, while an appeal is reviewed by an appellate court.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe a jury's verdict in your case is unjust, consider consulting with a legal professional to discuss the possibility of filing for a JNOV. You can explore US Legal Forms for templates and resources that may assist you in managing the necessary documentation. If your situation is complex, seeking professional legal help is advisable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.