The term "irregular use of process" refers to situations where legal procedures are misused or conducted improperly. This can occur when there are procedural mistakes, such as the incorrect use of legal tools like discovery requests, subpoenas, or attachments. It may also involve the wrongful application of legal proceedings, such as using them to extort or intimidate another party.
This term is commonly encountered in various areas of law, including civil litigation and criminal proceedings. In civil cases, irregular use of process may arise during discovery or when seeking court orders. Users can manage some aspects of these processes themselves, utilizing legal templates from US Legal Forms to ensure compliance with procedural requirements.
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A party files a subpoena to intimidate a witness into not testifying, which could be considered an irregular use of process.
Example 2: A lawyer improperly uses discovery requests to harass the opposing party rather than to gather relevant information (hypothetical example).
| State | Variation |
|---|---|
| California | Strict rules on the use of subpoenas to prevent harassment. |
| New York | Higher scrutiny on the use of discovery to ensure it is not used for harassment. |
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
| Term | Definition | Differences |
|---|---|---|
| Abuse of process | Using legal process for an ulterior motive. | Focuses on intent rather than procedural errors. |
| Malicious prosecution | Wrongfully initiating a legal action. | Involves initiating a lawsuit without probable cause. |
If you believe you are facing an irregular use of process, consider the following steps:
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
It involves procedural errors or wrongful intent in the use of legal processes.