We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act of 1986 and Its Impact on Fishery Management
Definition & Meaning
The Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act of 1986 is a federal law in the United States designed to support state efforts in managing fishery resources that cross state lines. This legislation encourages collaboration among states to ensure sustainable fishing practices and effective management of fish populations. The Act is codified at 16 USCS §§ 4101 through 4107 and has undergone several amendments since its initial passage.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This Act is primarily relevant in the context of environmental law and natural resource management. It is used by state agencies and interstate commissions to secure funding and resources for projects aimed at managing interjurisdictional fisheries. Legal practitioners may encounter this Act in cases involving fishery management, conservation efforts, and interstate resource disputes. Users can utilize legal templates from US Legal Forms to navigate the application process for funding or project proposals under this Act.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
One example of the Act in action is when a state agency submits a proposal to study the impact of climate change on local fish populations. If approved, the agency receives funding to conduct research and implement management strategies based on their findings.
(hypothetical example) Another example could involve an interstate commission working together to regulate fishing quotas for a shared fish species, ensuring sustainability across state borders.
Relevant laws & statutes
The primary statute relevant to this topic is the Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act of 1986 itself, codified at 16 USCS §§ 4. Other related laws may include the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, which governs federal fishery management.
State-by-state differences
State
Key Differences
California
Has specific regulations for coastal fisheries that may differ from federal guidelines.
Florida
Utilizes unique funding mechanisms for fishery management through state-specific programs.
Alaska
Emphasizes sustainable practices due to its diverse marine ecosystems and fishery resources.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Magnuson-Stevens Act
A federal law governing marine fishery management in U.S. waters.
Focuses more on federal management while the Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act emphasizes state collaboration.
State Fishery Management Plans
Plans developed by individual states to manage their fishery resources.
These plans must align with the broader goals of the Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are involved in fishery management or research, consider submitting a project proposal to the Secretary of Commerce. Ensure your proposal includes detailed plans and cost estimates. For assistance, explore the ready-to-use legal form templates available at US Legal Forms, which can help streamline the proposal process. If your situation is complex, seeking professional legal advice may be beneficial.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.