We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act and Its Importance
Definition & Meaning
The Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act is a federal law designed to support the management of fishery resources that cross state boundaries. It aims to promote cooperation among states in managing these resources, which can be found in both state waters and the exclusive economic zone. The Act defines interjurisdictional fishery resources as:
A fishery resource occurring in waters under the jurisdiction of multiple states and the exclusive economic zone.
A fishery resource that is part of an interstate fishery management plan.
A fishery resource that migrates between the waters of two or more states bordering the Great Lakes.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This Act is relevant in legal contexts involving environmental law, natural resource management, and interstate commerce. It guides states in developing management plans for fisheries that cross state lines and encourages research and conservation efforts. Users may find legal templates related to fisheries management and environmental compliance on platforms like US Legal Forms.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
One example of the Act in action is the collaborative management of striped bass in the Atlantic Ocean, where multiple states work together to create a sustainable fishing plan. Another example (hypothetical example) could involve a state developing a research initiative to study the migration patterns of salmon that travel between state waters and the exclusive economic zone.
Relevant laws & statutes
The primary statute governing this area is the Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act itself, codified at 16 USCS § 4102. Other relevant laws may include the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, which governs federal fisheries management.
State-by-state differences
State
Key Differences
California
Has specific regulations regarding the management of coastal fisheries.
Florida
Focuses on the management of both freshwater and saltwater fisheries.
Michigan
Emphasizes the conservation of Great Lakes fisheries.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Differences
Fisheries Management Act
A law focused on the sustainable management of fish stocks.
More focused on specific species rather than interjurisdictional issues.
Endangered Species Act
A law aimed at protecting species at risk of extinction.
Broader focus on species conservation rather than fisheries specifically.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are involved in fisheries management or are a stakeholder in interjurisdictional fisheries, consider reviewing state regulations and management plans. You can explore US Legal Forms for templates that may assist you in compliance and management efforts. If your situation is complex, consulting with a legal professional is advisable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.