US Legal Forms
Legal definitions
I
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

Understanding Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: A Legal Overview

Q: Can I file a claim for IIED without physical harm?

Yes, you can file a claim based solely on emotional distress without any physical injury.

Q: How long do I have to file an IIED claim?

The statute of limitations varies by state, but it is typically one to three years from the date of the incident.

Definition & Meaning

Intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) is a legal claim that occurs when one person intentionally engages in extreme or outrageous conduct that causes severe emotional suffering to another person. This type of tort focuses on the mental anguish resulting from the defendant's actions, which can include feelings of grief, anxiety, or humiliation. In some jurisdictions, this tort is also known as the tort of outrage.

Table of content

Legal Use & context

IIED is primarily used in civil law contexts, often arising in personal injury cases. It can be relevant in various legal areas, including family law, employment law, and defamation cases. Individuals may pursue claims for IIED when they believe they have suffered significant emotional distress due to another's harmful actions. Users can manage some aspects of these claims using legal templates available through US Legal Forms, which are drafted by qualified attorneys.

Key legal elements

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

Example 1: A person receives a false notification claiming that a close family member has died, leading to severe emotional trauma. (hypothetical example)

Example 2: A parent witnesses a child being harmed in an accident, causing extreme emotional distress. (hypothetical example)

Relevant laws & statutes

Case law examples relevant to IIED include:

Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc., 2 Cal.3d 493 (1970): This case outlines the elements required to prove IIED.
Doe v. White, 627 F. Supp. 2d 905 (C.D. Ill. 2009): This case further defines the necessary criteria for establishing IIED claims.

State-by-state differences

Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):

State	Key Differences
California	Recognizes IIED claims but requires a high standard for "outrageous conduct."
Missouri	Similar standards as California, but with additional emphasis on the context of the conduct.

This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.

Comparison with related terms

Term	Description
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress	Involves causing emotional distress through negligent actions rather than intentional conduct.
Defamation	Involves false statements that harm a person's reputation, which may also lead to emotional distress claims.

Common misunderstandings

What to do if this term applies to you

If you believe you have experienced intentional infliction of emotional distress, consider the following steps:

Document the incidents that caused your emotional distress.
Seek medical or psychological help to address your emotional suffering.
Consult with a legal professional to evaluate your case and discuss your options.
Explore legal templates available through US Legal Forms to assist in filing your claim.

Find the legal form that fits your case

Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.

This field is required

Quick facts

Attribute	Details
Typical Fees	Varies by attorney; often hourly or contingency-based.
Jurisdiction	State courts primarily handle IIED claims.
Possible Penalties	Compensatory damages for emotional distress; punitive damages in some cases.