We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Institutional Review Board [Food and Drugs]: Definition and Importance
Definition & Meaning
An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a group established by an institution to review and oversee biomedical research involving human participants. The primary purpose of an IRB is to ensure that the rights and welfare of research subjects are protected. This includes approving research proposals and conducting ongoing reviews of studies to ensure compliance with ethical standards and regulations.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
IRBs play a crucial role in the legal landscape of biomedical research. They are mandated by federal regulations, particularly in the context of research funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The IRB's responsibilities include:
Reviewing research proposals to ensure ethical standards are met.
Monitoring ongoing research to protect participants.
Ensuring informed consent processes are in place.
Researchers may use legal templates from US Legal Forms to help navigate the IRB application process and ensure compliance with regulations.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A university conducts a clinical trial for a new medication. Before the study begins, the IRB reviews the research proposal to ensure it meets ethical standards and protects participants.
Example 2: A researcher wants to study the effects of a new therapy on patients with chronic pain. They submit their proposal to the IRB, which evaluates the risks and benefits before granting approval. (hypothetical example)
Relevant laws & statutes
The primary regulation governing IRBs is found in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), specifically:
21 CFR 50: Protection of Human Subjects
21 CFR 56: Institutional Review Boards
These regulations establish the requirements for IRB composition, authority, and review processes.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
IRB Requirements
California
Requires additional state-specific training for IRB members.
New York
Mandates that all IRBs must register with the state health department.
Texas
IRBs must have at least one member with no affiliation to the institution.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
A group that reviews and approves research involving human subjects.
Focuses on ethical oversight of research.
Ethics Committee
A group that addresses ethical issues in healthcare settings.
May not specifically review research proposals.
Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB)
A group that monitors patient safety and treatment efficacy during clinical trials.
Focuses on ongoing safety rather than initial approval.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are involved in research that includes human subjects, you should:
Identify the appropriate IRB for your institution or organization.
Prepare your research proposal, ensuring it includes details about participant consent and ethical considerations.
Consult US Legal Forms for templates and resources to assist with the IRB submission process.
If you have complex legal questions, consider seeking assistance from a legal professional.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Typical Fees: Varies by institution; some may charge for review services.
Jurisdiction: Governed by federal regulations and state laws.
Possible Penalties: Non-compliance can lead to loss of funding and legal repercussions.
Key takeaways
Frequently asked questions
The main purpose of an IRB is to protect the rights and welfare of human research participants by ensuring that studies are conducted ethically.
An IRB must include members with diverse backgrounds, including scientific and non-scientific expertise, and at least one member who is not affiliated with the institution.
The review process duration can vary widely depending on the complexity of the study and the specific IRB, but it typically takes several weeks to months.