We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Informed Intermediary: Key Insights into Its Legal Significance
Definition & Meaning
An informed intermediary is a person involved in the distribution of a product, such as a drug or medical device, who understands the associated risks. This term is often used in the context of healthcare, where a physician acts as an informed intermediary between the manufacturer and the patient. The manufacturer fulfills its responsibility to warn about potential side effects by providing adequate information to the informed intermediary rather than directly to the consumer.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The concept of an informed intermediary is primarily relevant in product liability and medical malpractice cases. It is commonly applied in the following legal areas:
Product liability
Medical malpractice
Pharmaceutical law
Users can manage some aspects of these legal issues using templates and forms available through US Legal Forms, which are drafted by qualified attorneys to ensure compliance with legal standards.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A pharmaceutical company produces a new medication. They provide detailed information about potential side effects to doctors, who then inform their patients about these risks before prescribing the medication.
Example 2: A manufacturer of a medical device supplies necessary safety information to surgeons, who evaluate the device's risks and benefits based on their patients' medical histories before recommending it for use. (hypothetical example)
Relevant laws & statutes
One significant case that illustrates the informed intermediary doctrine is Bukowski v. CooperVision, Inc., 185 A.D.2d 31 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993). This case emphasizes the manufacturer's obligation to warn of all known dangers associated with their products and the role of the physician as an informed intermediary.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Key Differences
California
Strict liability applies, requiring manufacturers to warn about risks regardless of intermediary knowledge.
New York
Emphasizes the role of the informed intermediary in assessing risks before patient interaction.
Texas
Allows for defenses based on the intermediary's knowledge and actions in patient care.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe you have been affected by a product's risks that were not adequately communicated, consider the following steps:
Consult with a healthcare professional to understand your situation better.
Gather documentation related to the product and any communications from your healthcare provider.
Explore legal forms available on US Legal Forms to assist with any claims or inquiries.
If your case is complex, seek advice from a qualified attorney.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
An informed intermediary is a person, often a healthcare provider, who understands the risks of a product and communicates those risks to the consumer.
This doctrine allows manufacturers to meet their warning obligations by informing healthcare providers, who then relay the information to patients.
No, the provider must have the necessary knowledge and expertise to assess the risks and benefits of the product.