What is Indirect Bucketing? A Comprehensive Legal Overview
Definition & meaning
Indirect bucketing refers to a practice in trading where a broker, with the help of a trader, executes trades that are opposite to those of their own customer. This occurs while giving the impression that they are trading against the accommodating trader. Essentially, it involves a broker manipulating the market to benefit from their client's trades without the client's knowledge.
Table of content
Everything you need for legal paperwork
Access 85,000+ trusted legal forms and simple tools to fill, manage, and organize your documents.
This term is primarily used in the context of financial and securities law. Indirect bucketing can be relevant in cases involving market manipulation, fraud, and violations of fiduciary duties. It is important for brokers and traders to understand this term as it can lead to serious legal consequences, including penalties from regulatory bodies like the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
Key Legal Elements
Real-World Examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
(Hypothetical example) A broker receives a buy order from a client for 100 shares of a stock. Instead of executing this order directly, the broker collaborates with a trader to sell those shares to another party while making it appear as though the broker is fulfilling the client's order. This action can mislead the client and harm their financial interests.
Comparison with Related Terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Direct Bucketing
Trading directly opposite a client's order without manipulation.
More straightforward and transparent compared to indirect bucketing.
Market Manipulation
Actions taken to artificially influence the price of a security.
Indirect bucketing can be a form of market manipulation, but not all manipulation involves bucketing.
Common Misunderstandings
What to Do If This Term Applies to You
If you suspect that indirect bucketing has occurred, consider the following steps:
Document all relevant transactions and communications.
Consult with a legal professional who specializes in securities law.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that may help you address the issue.
Quick Facts
Attribute
Details
Typical Fees
Varies by brokerage; may include commissions and fees for trades.
Jurisdiction
Federal and state securities laws.
Possible Penalties
Fines, suspension, or revocation of trading licenses.
Key Takeaways
FAQs
Direct bucketing involves straightforward trades opposite a client's order, while indirect bucketing includes deceptive practices to mislead clients.
No, it is generally considered illegal and can lead to regulatory penalties.
Stay informed about your trades, ask questions, and consult with legal professionals if you suspect misconduct.