Understanding the Increased-Risk-of-Harm Doctrine in Medical Malpractice

Q: Can I claim damages without a specific injury?

Yes, this doctrine allows claims based on the loss of chance of recovery, even if no specific injury occurred.

Q: How does this doctrine vary by state?

The application of the increased-risk-of-harm doctrine can differ significantly between states, with some accepting it and others rejecting it.

Q: What should I do if I think I have a case?

Document your medical history, consult with a legal professional, and consider using legal templates to assist in filing your claim.

Definition & Meaning

The increased-risk-of-harm doctrine is a legal principle primarily used in medical malpractice cases. This doctrine allows a patient to seek damages from a healthcare provider if the provider's negligence has reduced the patient's chances of recovery from a preexisting medical condition, even if no specific injury occurred due to that negligence. In essence, it recognizes that a doctor's actions can negatively impact a patient's likelihood of survival or recovery.

Table of content

Legal Use & context

This doctrine is relevant in civil law, particularly in medical malpractice lawsuits. It applies when a healthcare professional's failure to meet the standard of care leads to a diminished chance of recovery for the patient. Users can manage related legal processes by utilizing legal templates from US Legal Forms, which can help in drafting necessary documents for claims.

Key legal elements

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

(Hypothetical example) A patient with a serious heart condition consults a cardiologist. If the cardiologist fails to recommend a necessary procedure, and as a result, the patient's chance of survival decreases, the patient may claim damages under the increased-risk-of-harm doctrine.
(Hypothetical example) A cancer patient receives incorrect treatment from their doctor. If this treatment reduces their chance of recovery, they can pursue a claim based on this doctrine.

State-by-state differences

State	Application of Doctrine
California	Recognizes the increased-risk-of-harm doctrine in medical malpractice cases.
Texas	Generally does not apply this doctrine; focuses on actual injury.
New York	Accepts the doctrine under specific circumstances in malpractice claims.

This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.

Comparison with related terms

Term	Definition	Key Differences
Loss-of-Chance Doctrine	Similar to the increased-risk-of-harm doctrine; focuses on the loss of a chance of recovery.	Often used interchangeably but may have different applications in certain jurisdictions.
Negligence	Failure to take proper care in doing something, leading to damage or injury.	Negligence requires proof of actual injury, while increased-risk-of-harm allows claims without specific injuries.

Common misunderstandings

What to do if this term applies to you

If you believe the increased-risk-of-harm doctrine applies to your situation, consider the following steps:

Document all relevant medical records and communications with your healthcare provider.
Consult with a legal professional who specializes in medical malpractice to assess your case.
You can also explore US Legal Forms for templates that may assist you in filing a claim.

For complex cases, professional legal help is highly recommended to navigate the nuances of your claim.

Find the legal form that fits your case

Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.

This field is required

Quick facts

Typical jurisdiction: Civil courts in the state where the malpractice occurred.
Possible damages: Varies by state and case specifics.
Standard of proof: Preponderance of evidence.
Statute of limitations: Typically ranges from one to three years, depending on the state.

Key takeaways

Frequently asked questions

What is the increased-risk-of-harm doctrine?

It is a legal principle that allows patients to claim damages if a healthcare provider's negligence decreases their chances of recovery from a preexisting condition.