We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Implied Trust: A Comprehensive Guide to Its Legal Definition and Types
Definition & Meaning
An implied trust is a type of trust established by law rather than by explicit agreement between parties. It arises when the circumstances suggest that the parties intended to create a trust, even if they did not formally do so. Implied trusts can be categorized into two main types: constructive trusts and resulting trusts.
A resulting trust typically emerges from the actions or conduct of the parties involved, indicating that one party holds property for the benefit of another. In contrast, a constructive trust is an equitable remedy designed to prevent unjust enrichment, allowing a party to recover property or damages when another party has wrongfully benefited at their expense.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Implied trusts are commonly encountered in various areas of law, including civil, family, and probate law. They often arise in situations involving property disputes, inheritance claims, or financial transactions where the intent to create a trust is inferred from the actions of the parties involved.
Users may find it beneficial to utilize legal forms offered by US Legal Forms to create documents related to implied trusts, such as trust agreements or declarations, which can help clarify intentions and protect their interests.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A person transfers property to another individual without a formal trust agreement, believing it to be for their benefit. If the recipient sells the property and keeps the proceeds, a court may impose a resulting trust to ensure the original owner receives compensation.
Example 2: A partner in a business contributes funds to a venture but does not receive a formal ownership interest. If the other partner profits from the venture without sharing, the contributing partner may seek a constructive trust to recover their fair share of the profits. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Key Differences
California
Constructive trusts are often used in divorce proceedings to ensure equitable distribution of assets.
New York
Resulting trusts may be more readily recognized in cases of implied intent based on financial contributions.
Texas
Texas law has specific statutes regarding the creation of implied trusts in property disputes.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Constructive Trust
A trust imposed by law to prevent unjust enrichment.
Focuses on equitable remedies rather than intent.
Resulting Trust
A trust that arises when property is transferred under circumstances indicating that the transferor did not intend to benefit the transferee.
Based on the conduct of the parties involved.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe an implied trust applies to your situation, consider the following steps:
Gather evidence of the conduct and intentions of the parties involved.
Consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and options.
Explore legal forms available through US Legal Forms to draft necessary documents.
If the matter is complex, professional legal assistance may be essential to navigate the implications of an implied trust.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Implied trusts arise from actions or circumstances, not formal agreements.
Two main types: constructive trusts and resulting trusts.
Common in property disputes, family law, and financial transactions.
Equitable remedies may be sought to prevent unjust enrichment.
Key takeaways
Frequently asked questions
An implied trust is established by law based on circumstances, while an express trust is created through a formal agreement between parties.
Yes, parties may contest the existence or terms of an implied trust in court, especially if there is disagreement about the intentions of the parties involved.
Evidence of the conduct and intentions of the parties, such as communications, actions, and financial transactions, can help establish the existence of an implied trust.