Understanding the Genuine Issue of Material Fact in Legal Context
Definition & Meaning
A genuine issue of material fact refers to a situation in legal proceedings where there is a real dispute about facts that are significant to the case's outcome. This term is commonly used in motions for summary judgment, which seek to resolve a case without a trial. If there is no genuine issue of material fact, a court can grant summary judgment, meaning the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Essentially, for a fact to be considered 'genuine,' it must not be conclusively established by undisputed facts, while a 'material' fact is one that could affect the resolution of the case.
Legal Use & context
This term is primarily used in civil litigation, especially in motions for summary judgment. It plays a crucial role in determining whether a case should proceed to trial or if it can be resolved based on the evidence presented. Lawyers often use this concept to argue that there are no significant facts in dispute, thereby supporting their request for a summary judgment. Users can find relevant legal forms through platforms like US Legal Forms to help manage these motions effectively.
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
(Hypothetical example) In a personal injury case, if one party claims that the accident occurred due to a traffic signal malfunction, and the other party provides evidence showing the signal was functioning correctly, there is a genuine issue of material fact regarding the cause of the accident.
(Hypothetical example) In a contract dispute, if one party asserts that a contract was breached while the other party claims it was not, the existence of the contract and the terms involved would be a material fact that needs resolution.