Feres Doctrine: A Comprehensive Guide to Its Legal Definition and Impact

Q: What types of injuries are covered under the Feres Doctrine?

The doctrine applies to injuries that occur during active duty and arise from military service.

Q: Are there any exceptions to the Feres Doctrine?

Generally, there are no exceptions for injuries related to military service, but specific circumstances may warrant legal advice.

Definition & Meaning

The Feres Doctrine is a legal principle that prevents military personnel from suing the United States government for injuries sustained while on active duty. Established by the Supreme Court in the case of Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135 (1950), this doctrine bars service members from recovering damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) for injuries related to their military service. The FTCA generally allows individuals to sue the government for wrongful acts by its employees, but the Feres Doctrine specifically excludes members of the armed forces from this right.

Table of content

Legal Use & context

The Feres Doctrine is primarily relevant in the context of military law and personal injury claims. It applies to cases where service members seek compensation for injuries that occur during their military duties. This doctrine is significant in civil law, particularly in tort claims, as it establishes a clear boundary regarding the accountability of the government for injuries sustained by military personnel. Users may encounter this doctrine when exploring legal forms related to personal injury or military service claims.

Key legal elements

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

Example 1: A soldier sustains an injury during a training exercise due to negligence in equipment maintenance. Under the Feres Doctrine, this soldier cannot sue the government for damages.

Example 2: A service member experiences a medical malpractice incident while receiving treatment at a military hospital. This claim is also barred by the Feres Doctrine. (hypothetical example)

Relevant laws & statutes

The primary legal reference for the Feres Doctrine is the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq.) and the Supreme Court decision in Feres v. United States. These legal frameworks outline the limitations on lawsuits against the government by military personnel.

Comparison with related terms

Term	Definition	Difference
Federal Tort Claims Act	A statute allowing individuals to sue the federal government for wrongful acts.	The Feres Doctrine specifically excludes military personnel from this act.
Negligence	Failure to take proper care, resulting in damage or injury to another.	Negligence claims by military members are barred under the Feres Doctrine.

Common misunderstandings

What to do if this term applies to you

If you are a service member and believe you have a claim related to an injury sustained during military service, it is essential to understand the implications of the Feres Doctrine. You may want to:

Consult with a legal professional who specializes in military law to discuss your situation.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that may assist you in understanding your rights and options.
Consider alternative avenues for support, such as military benefits or claims through the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Find the legal form that fits your case

Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.

This field is required

Quick facts

Attribute	Details
Applicable Law	Federal Tort Claims Act
Primary Case	Feres v. United States
Who is Affected	Active duty military personnel
Type of Claims Barred	Claims for injuries during military service