We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Explanatory-Phrase Rule in Trademark Law
Definition & Meaning
The explanatory phrase rule is a legal principle in trademark law that protects the rights of senior users of family-name trademarks. Under this rule, if a family name appears on competing goods or services, the senior user can seek legal remedies for unfair competition. This typically involves requiring the junior user to clarify in their advertisements that they are not affiliated with the senior user's business. The rule aims to balance two important rights: the right of individuals to use their family names in business and the right to prevent unfair harm to another's business reputation.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This term is commonly used in trademark law, which falls under civil law. It is relevant in cases involving unfair competition and trademark infringement. Users can manage related legal issues by utilizing templates and forms available through US Legal Forms, which are drafted by qualified attorneys to help navigate these situations effectively.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: If a company named "Smith's Bakery" is established first, and another bakery opens under the name "Smith's Sweets," the original bakery may invoke the explanatory phrase rule to protect its name. The new bakery might be required to indicate in its advertisements that it is not affiliated with "Smith's Bakery."
(Hypothetical example): A clothing brand named "Johnson Apparel" finds another brand called "Johnson's Fashion" emerging. The original brand could request that the new brand clarify its independence in promotional materials to avoid misleading consumers.
State-by-state differences
State
Key Differences
California
More stringent requirements for proving consumer confusion.
New York
Stronger protections for senior users of family names.
Texas
Allows for broader use of family names in certain contexts.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Difference
Trademark Infringement
Unauthorized use of a trademark that causes confusion.
Focuses on registered trademarks, while the explanatory phrase rule deals with family names.
Unfair Competition
Business practices that cause economic harm to another business.
Broader concept that includes various unfair practices beyond name usage.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe the explanatory phrase rule applies to your situation, consider the following steps:
Review your use of the family name in connection with your business.
Consult with a legal professional to assess potential conflicts with existing trademarks.
Utilize US Legal Forms to find templates for necessary legal documents to protect your rights.
If disputes arise, seek legal counsel to navigate negotiations or litigation.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.