Excited Utterances: Key Insights into Their Legal Significance

Definition & Meaning

Excited utterances are statements made by a person who is experiencing a high level of emotional stress due to a startling event. These statements can be admitted as evidence in court, despite being made outside of the courtroom, because they are considered spontaneous and not the result of careful reflection. The key aspect of excited utterances is that they must relate directly to the event that caused the excitement.

Table of content

Legal Use & context

Excited utterances are commonly used in both civil and criminal cases as an exception to the hearsay rule. This rule generally prohibits the use of out-of-court statements as evidence unless they fall under specific exceptions. In legal practice, excited utterances can be crucial in cases involving personal injury, domestic violence, or other situations where immediate reactions are pertinent. Users can manage related legal processes using templates available through US Legal Forms.

Key legal elements

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

(Hypothetical example): A witness at a car accident immediately exclaims, "That car ran the red light!" This statement can be considered an excited utterance because it was made in the heat of the moment, directly relating to the startling event.

(Hypothetical example): After witnessing a robbery, a person shouts, "He had a gun!" This statement reflects the immediate emotional response to a frightening situation and may be admissible in court.

State-by-state differences

Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):

State	Key Differences
California	Excited utterances can be admitted if made within a reasonable time after the event, often considered to be within minutes.
New York	Similar to federal standards, but courts may allow longer time frames based on circumstances.
Texas	Admissibility is strict; statements must be made almost immediately after the event to qualify.

This is not a complete list. State laws vary and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.

Comparison with related terms

Term	Definition	Key Differences
Present Sense Impression	A statement made about an event while it is occurring.	Excited utterances focus on emotional stress; present sense impressions do not require emotional context.
Hearsay	Out-of-court statements offered for the truth of the matter asserted.	Excited utterances are an exception to hearsay rules, allowing emotional statements as evidence.

Common misunderstandings

People often think all spontaneous statements qualify as excited utterances. However, the statement must relate directly to a startling event.
Some believe that any statement made shortly after an event is admissible. In reality, the emotional state of the declarant is crucial.
Many assume that excited utterances must be made immediately. While timing is important, courts may consider surrounding circumstances for statements made within a reasonable time frame.

What to do if this term applies to you

If you believe an excited utterance is relevant to your situation, consider the following steps:

Document the statement and the circumstances surrounding it as soon as possible.
Consult with a legal professional to understand how this evidence can be used in your case.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you manage related legal processes.
If your situation is complex, seek professional legal assistance to navigate the specifics of your case.

Find the legal form that fits your case

Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.

This field is required

Quick facts

Type: Legal exception to hearsay
Typical timeframe for admissibility: During or shortly after the event
Usage: Common in civil and criminal cases
Consideration: Emotional stress of the declarant