We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding Enforcing Awards [Securities Dispute Resolution]: A Legal Overview
Definition & meaning
Enforcing awards in the context of securities dispute resolution refers to the legal process by which a party seeks to compel compliance with an arbitral award. While parties may voluntarily adhere to such awards, enforcement becomes necessary when one party fails to comply. In these cases, only a court has the authority to enforce the award, as arbitral panels do not possess enforcement powers.
Table of content
Legal use & context
This term is primarily used in the context of arbitration, particularly in civil disputes involving securities. It is relevant in various legal practices, including commercial law and contract disputes. Users may find that they can manage the enforcement process themselves using legal templates provided by services like US Legal Forms, which offer forms drafted by attorneys for such situations.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A company receives an arbitral award for damages due to a breach of contract. When the opposing party refuses to pay, the company may file a lawsuit to enforce the award in court.
Example 2: An investor wins an arbitral award against a brokerage for mishandling transactions. If the brokerage does not comply, the investor can seek enforcement through the courts. (hypothetical example)
Relevant laws & statutes
The Federal Arbitration Act (Title 9 of the United States Code) governs the enforcement of arbitral awards. Key sections include:
Section 9: Allows parties to sue for enforcement within one year.
Section 10: Outlines exclusive grounds for vacating an award, as clarified in Hall Street Associates v. Mattel (2008).
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Enforcement Variations
California
Generally follows the Federal Arbitration Act but has additional state-specific rules for enforcement.
New York
Allows for expedited enforcement procedures in certain cases.
Texas
Has specific statutes that may affect the enforcement of arbitral awards in commercial disputes.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself needing to enforce an arbitral award, consider the following steps:
Review the arbitral award and ensure you understand its terms.
Consult with a legal professional if you are unsure about the enforcement process.
Explore legal templates available through US Legal Forms to prepare necessary documents for court.
Be mindful of the one-year time limit for enforcement actions.
Find a legal form that suits your needs
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.