We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
The Dual-Criminality Principle: Key Insights and Legal Implications
Definition & Meaning
The dual-criminality principle is a legal concept that states a person can only be extradited if their actions are considered a crime in both the requesting country and the country from which they are being extradited. This principle ensures that individuals are not extradited for actions that are not recognized as criminal in their home country.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This principle is primarily used in criminal law, particularly in extradition cases. It ensures that a person cannot be sent to another country to face charges unless those charges are also recognized as crimes in their own country. Legal practitioners often refer to this principle when evaluating extradition requests, ensuring compliance with both domestic and international laws. Users can manage some aspects of this process through legal forms provided by services like US Legal Forms.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
For instance, if a person is accused of fraud in the United Kingdom, they can only be extradited to the U.S. if fraud is also a crime under U.S. law. If fraud is not recognized as a crime in the U.S., extradition would not be permissible.
(Hypothetical example) If a person is charged with a cybercrime in Canada, they cannot be extradited to Australia unless that same cybercrime is also illegal in Australia.
Relevant laws & statutes
The dual-criminality principle is reflected in various extradition treaties, including:
U.S.-U.K. Extradition Treaty, June 8, 1972.
U.S.-Canada Extradition Treaty, December 3, 1971.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Extradition Law Variations
California
Follows dual-criminality but has specific state laws governing extradition procedures.
Texas
Similar dual-criminality requirements, with additional provisions for certain offenses.
New York
Strict adherence to dual-criminality, with detailed statutory guidelines.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Extradition
The formal process of surrendering an individual from one jurisdiction to another for prosecution or punishment.
Dual Criminality
The principle that an act must be a crime in both jurisdictions for extradition to occur.
Mutual Legal Assistance
A process where countries cooperate in criminal investigations and prosecutions, which may not require dual-criminality.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself facing extradition, it is crucial to understand the dual-criminality principle. You may want to:
Consult a legal professional who specializes in extradition law.
Explore legal forms that can assist you in contesting extradition.
Gather evidence that demonstrates the lack of dual criminality in your case.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.