We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Double Criminality: A Comprehensive Guide to Its Legal Implications
Definition & Meaning
Double criminality, also known as dual criminality, refers to a legal principle that requires a crime to be recognized as illegal in both the country requesting extradition and the country where the suspect is located. This principle ensures that extradition can only occur for offenses that are considered crimes in both jurisdictions. The specific terminology or classification of the crime does not need to be identical in both countries, as long as the act itself is deemed criminal in both places.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Double criminality is primarily used in the context of international law, particularly in extradition cases. It plays a crucial role in criminal law, where it ensures that individuals are not extradited for actions that are not considered crimes in the country where they are found. Legal practitioners often rely on this principle when assessing extradition requests and determining the legality of transferring a suspect between jurisdictions. Users can find relevant legal forms and templates on platforms like US Legal Forms to assist in navigating these processes.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A person is accused of fraud in Country A, and Country B seeks extradition. If fraud is also a crime in Country B, and the actions taken by the individual are illegal in both countries, extradition can proceed.
Example 2: A suspect is charged with drug trafficking in Country A. If drug trafficking is not recognized as a crime in Country B, extradition will not be granted, even if the suspect is wanted for the same act in Country A. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Extradition Requirements
California
Follows the principle of double criminality, requiring that the act be a crime in both California and the requesting state.
New York
Adheres to double criminality, ensuring that extradition is only granted for acts that are illegal in both jurisdictions.
Texas
Requires that the alleged crime be recognized in both Texas and the requesting state for extradition to occur.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Difference
Extradition
The process of surrendering a suspect from one jurisdiction to another.
Double criminality is a requirement for extradition to occur.
Dual Criminality
Another term for double criminality; often used interchangeably.
None; they are synonymous.
Mutual Legal Assistance
A process for countries to cooperate in criminal investigations and prosecutions.
Does not necessarily require double criminality.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself involved in an extradition case or believe double criminality may apply to your situation, consider the following steps:
Consult with a legal professional who specializes in international law or extradition cases.
Gather all relevant documentation regarding the charges and the legal frameworks of both countries.
Explore legal form templates on US Legal Forms to assist with necessary filings or documentation.
Understand your rights and the legal processes involved in extradition.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Double criminality ensures a crime is illegal in both jurisdictions.
Extradition is contingent upon this principle.
Legal definitions may vary, but the act must be criminal in both locations.
Consult local laws for specific requirements regarding extradition.
Key takeaways
Frequently asked questions
Double criminality is a principle that requires a crime to be recognized as illegal in both the requesting and the requested country for extradition to occur.
No, the crime does not need to be described in the same terms; it must simply be criminal in both jurisdictions.
If double criminality is not met, extradition cannot be granted, and the suspect cannot be transferred to the requesting country.
Yes, as long as the offense is recognized as a crime in both jurisdictions, extradition can occur for any offense.