Understanding Dissipation of Marital Assets: Definition and Legal Context

Q: Can I claim dissipation if my spouse spent money before we decided to divorce?

It depends on state law; some states require the spending to occur after the marriage breakdown, while others focus on intent.

Q: What evidence do I need to prove dissipation?

You should gather records of financial transactions, such as bank statements, receipts, and any documentation showing the purpose of expenditures.

Definition & Meaning

Dissipation of marital assets refers to the improper use or waste of shared financial resources during a marriage. This can occur through excessive spending, gambling, giving gifts, or borrowing money without justification. In the context of divorce, it can also involve hiding or transferring assets to prevent a spouse from claiming their fair share. Courts may intervene to stop such actions, and the person accused of dissipation must provide clear evidence of how marital funds were used and that these expenses were legitimate.

Table of content

Legal Use & context

This term is primarily used in family law, particularly in divorce proceedings. Dissipation can affect asset division and may lead to legal actions to recover lost funds. Individuals facing accusations of dissipation can utilize legal forms and templates from US Legal Forms to navigate their situation effectively. Understanding this term is crucial for anyone involved in a divorce where asset division is contested.

Key legal elements

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

(Hypothetical example) A spouse spends a significant amount of marital funds on gambling after the couple has decided to separate. This spending could be considered dissipation, as it depletes the couple's shared assets without justification.

(Hypothetical example) One partner gives away a valuable piece of property to a friend shortly after filing for divorce, which may be viewed as an attempt to hide assets from the other spouse.

State-by-state differences

State	Requirement for Dissipation
California	Dissipation must occur after the marriage has broken down.
Florida	Dissipation can be claimed if the expenditure was intended to deprive the other spouse of their rights.
New York	Requires proof of intentional waste of marital assets.

This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.

Comparison with related terms

Term	Definition
Dissipation of assets	Improper use of marital funds during a divorce.
Fraudulent conveyance	Transferring assets to avoid creditors or legal claims.
Waste	Unjustifiable depletion of marital assets without benefit to the marriage.

Common misunderstandings

Many believe that any spending during a marriage constitutes dissipation; however, legitimate expenses for marital needs do not qualify.
Some think that dissipation claims can only be made after separation, but in some states, the intent to deprive can be assessed regardless of timing.
It is a misconception that the burden of proof lies solely with the spouse alleging dissipation; the accused must also provide evidence of legitimate expenditures.

What to do if this term applies to you

If you believe dissipation of marital assets is occurring, it's important to document all financial transactions and gather evidence. Consider consulting with a legal professional to understand your rights and options. You can also explore US Legal Forms for templates and resources that can assist you in managing your situation effectively.

Find the legal form that fits your case

Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.

This field is required

Quick facts

Common actions considered as dissipation include gambling, excessive spending, and gifting assets.
Burden of proof lies with the accused to show legitimate use of funds.
State laws vary significantly regarding the definition and requirements for proving dissipation.
Courts may issue injunctions to prevent further dissipation during divorce proceedings.