We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Cost-type OT: A Comprehensive Guide to Its Legal Definition
Definition & Meaning
Cost-type Other Transactions (OT) are agreements where payments are determined based on the financial or cost records of the awardee. These agreements typically require that at least one-third of the total costs be covered by non-Federal parties. They may also involve the submission of financial records or reports to assess whether additional efforts can be funded within a fixed amount. These agreements are often utilized in research and development projects, particularly in the defense sector.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Cost-type OT agreements are primarily used in the context of federal procurement, particularly within the Department of Defense. They are relevant in areas such as:
Research and development contracts
Collaborative projects between federal and non-federal entities
Prototype development initiatives
Users may find templates for these agreements on platforms like US Legal Forms, which can help in managing the documentation required for such transactions.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A defense contractor enters into a cost-type OT agreement to develop a new military technology. The contractor is reimbursed for their expenses, while also securing funding from private sector partners.
Example 2: A university collaborates with the Department of Defense on a research project under a cost-type OT agreement, sharing costs and resources to innovate in defense technology. (hypothetical example)
Relevant laws & statutes
Cost-type OT agreements are governed by Title 32 of the Code of Federal Regulations, specifically 32 CFR 3.4. This regulation outlines the framework for such agreements within the Department of Defense.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Cost-type OT
Agreements where payments are based on actual costs incurred.
Requires non-Federal funding and financial reporting.
Fixed-price contract
Agreements where a set price is agreed upon before the work begins.
No adjustments based on actual costs; risk is on the contractor.
Grants
Funds provided for specific purposes without the expectation of repayment.
Typically do not require cost-sharing or financial reporting to the same extent.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are involved in a project that may require a cost-type OT agreement, consider the following steps:
Assess your project's funding needs and identify potential non-Federal partners.
Gather necessary financial records to support your application.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can assist in drafting the agreement.
If the process seems complex, consulting a legal professional may be beneficial.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.