We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Continuing Violation Doctrine and Its Legal Implications
Definition & Meaning
The continuing violation doctrine is a legal principle that allows individuals to pursue claims for ongoing unlawful actions, even if some of those actions occurred outside the usual time limits for filing a lawsuit. This doctrine is particularly relevant in cases of employment discrimination, where an employee may experience a series of abusive acts over time. The employee can bring a legal action based on any of these acts, as long as at least one of them occurred within the statute of limitations period.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This doctrine is primarily used in civil law, especially in employment discrimination cases. It provides a way for individuals who have faced a pattern of discriminatory behavior, such as harassment or unfair treatment, to seek justice even if some incidents happened a long time ago. Users can manage their claims by utilizing legal templates from US Legal Forms, which are designed to assist in filing such actions properly.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
1. An employee experiences ongoing harassment from a supervisor over several months. Although some incidents occurred beyond the typical filing period, the employee can still file a lawsuit because the harassment is part of a continuing violation.
2. A worker is repeatedly denied promotions based on discriminatory factors. If the most recent denial occurred within the limitations period, the worker can challenge all prior denials as part of a continuing pattern of discrimination.
State-by-state differences
State
Notes
California
Recognizes the continuing violation doctrine in employment discrimination cases, allowing claims for ongoing harassment.
New York
Also applies the doctrine, enabling individuals to include past discriminatory acts if they are part of a continuing pattern.
Texas
Recognizes the doctrine but may have stricter interpretations regarding what constitutes a continuing violation.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Description
Single Violation Doctrine
Applies to isolated incidents of unlawful conduct, where only one act is actionable within the limitations period.
Continuing Tort
Refers to a series of wrongful acts that cause ongoing harm, similar to the continuing violation doctrine but may apply in different contexts.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe you have experienced a continuing violation, consider the following steps:
Document all incidents of unlawful conduct, including dates and details.
Consult with a legal professional to evaluate your case and determine your options.
Explore legal templates available on US Legal Forms to assist in filing your claim.
If your situation is complex, seeking professional legal help is advisable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.